FVRR vs. SMH
FVRR (Fiverr International Ltd.) is a stock, while SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Over the past 5 years, FVRR returned -44.87%/yr vs 39.21%/yr for SMH. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FVRR vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FVRR achieves a -49.04% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 77.13% return.
FVRR
- 1D
- -4.82%
- 1M
- -12.96%
- YTD
- -49.04%
- 6M
- -53.10%
- 1Y
- -69.16%
- 3Y*
- -28.15%
- 5Y*
- -44.87%
- 10Y*
- —
SMH
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 25.87%
- YTD
- 77.13%
- 6M
- 75.61%
- 1Y
- 157.20%
- 3Y*
- 64.17%
- 5Y*
- 39.21%
- 10Y*
- 37.68%
FVRR vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVRR Fiverr International Ltd. | -49.04% | -37.72% | 16.57% | -6.59% | -74.37% | -41.72% | 730.21% | -41.10% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 77.13% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 36.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between FVRR and SMH is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2019 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FVRR and SMH has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FVRR vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
FVRR
SMH
FVRR vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FVRR | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -8.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.68 | 1.72 | -1.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | 10.59 | -11.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.46 | 40.63 | -42.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FVRR | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.45 | 5.19 | -6.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.70 | 1.13 | -1.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.26 | 0.34 | -0.60 |
Drawdowns
FVRR vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FVRR drawdown since its inception was -96.98%, which is greater than SMH's maximum drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVRR and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FVRR | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.98% | -84.96% | -12.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.11% | -14.93% | -56.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -72.47% | -35.74% | -36.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.23% | -45.30% | -50.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.88% | 0.00% | -96.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.59% | -41.09% | -26.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 47.22% | 3.89% | +43.33% |
Volatility
FVRR vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) has a higher volatility of 14.33% compared to VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) at 11.47%. This indicates that FVRR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FVRR | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.33% | 11.47% | +2.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.05% | 24.29% | +13.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.74% | 30.56% | +17.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.02% | 35.01% | +29.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.12% | 32.57% | +35.55% |
Dividends
FVRR vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
FVRR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVRR Fiverr International Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FVRR and SMH have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FVRR has higher volatility (14.33%) compared to SMH (11.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVRR dropped -96.98% vs SMH's -84.96%.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.19 vs -1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FVRR and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer