FVD vs. NOBL
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Value Line Dividend Index (FVD) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL).
FVD and NOBL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FVD is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Value Line Dividend Index. It was launched on Aug 26, 2003. NOBL is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. It was launched on Oct 9, 2013. Both FVD and NOBL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FVD or NOBL.
Key characteristics
| FVD | NOBL | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 15.29% | 13.49% |
| 1Y Return | 26.15% | 25.68% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 5.74% | 5.81% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 7.86% | 9.92% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 9.29% | 10.34% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.52 | 2.37 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.61 | 3.35 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.47 | 1.42 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.48 | 2.37 |
| Martin Ratio | 14.95 | 10.96 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.70% | 2.25% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.11% | 10.40% |
| Max Drawdown | -51.00% | -35.43% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -1.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between FVD and NOBL is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FVD vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FVD achieves a 15.29% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 13.49% return. Over the past 10 years, FVD has underperformed NOBL with an annualized return of 9.29%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively higher 10.34% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FVD vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FVD has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FVD vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Value Line Dividend Index (FVD) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FVD vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison
FVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, more than NOBL's 1.99% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVD First Trust Value Line Dividend Index | 2.15% | 2.34% | 2.20% | 1.75% | 2.31% | 2.03% | 2.50% | 2.10% | 2.04% | 2.35% | 2.46% | 2.28% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 1.99% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% | 1.60% | 0.30% |
Drawdowns
FVD vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FVD drawdown since its inception was -51.00%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVD and NOBL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FVD vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index (FVD) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) have volatilities of 3.01% and 3.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.