PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FVD vs. NOBL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FVD and NOBL is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

FVD vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Value Line Dividend Index (FVD) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
3.35%
0.95%
FVD
NOBL

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FVD:

0.99

NOBL:

0.70

Sortino Ratio

FVD:

1.41

NOBL:

1.03

Omega Ratio

FVD:

1.18

NOBL:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

FVD:

1.23

NOBL:

0.75

Martin Ratio

FVD:

4.09

NOBL:

2.32

Ulcer Index

FVD:

2.46%

NOBL:

3.15%

Daily Std Dev

FVD:

10.14%

NOBL:

10.46%

Max Drawdown

FVD:

-50.99%

NOBL:

-35.43%

Current Drawdown

FVD:

-6.24%

NOBL:

-7.58%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVD achieves a -0.27% return, which is significantly lower than NOBL's 0.12% return. Over the past 10 years, FVD has underperformed NOBL with an annualized return of 8.48%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively higher 9.51% annualized return.


FVD

YTD

-0.27%

1M

-2.62%

6M

2.68%

1Y

10.95%

5Y*

5.92%

10Y*

8.48%

NOBL

YTD

0.12%

1M

-3.36%

6M

0.13%

1Y

8.05%

5Y*

7.76%

10Y*

9.51%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FVD vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVD has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.


FVD
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index
Expense ratio chart for FVD: current value at 0.70% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.70%
Expense ratio chart for NOBL: current value at 0.35% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.35%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FVD vs. NOBL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FVD is 4747
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FVD is 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FVD is 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FVD is 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FVD is 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FVD is 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

NOBL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NOBL is 3434
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NOBL is 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NOBL is 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NOBL is 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NOBL is 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NOBL is 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FVD vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Value Line Dividend Index (FVD) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FVD, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.990.70
The chart of Sortino ratio for FVD, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.411.03
The chart of Omega ratio for FVD, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.181.12
The chart of Calmar ratio for FVD, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.230.75
The chart of Martin ratio for FVD, currently valued at 4.09, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.004.092.32
FVD
NOBL

The current FVD Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is higher than the NOBL Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVD and NOBL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.99
0.70
FVD
NOBL

Dividends

FVD vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison

FVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than NOBL's 2.05% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FVD
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index
2.23%2.23%2.34%2.20%1.75%2.31%2.03%2.50%2.10%2.04%2.35%2.46%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.05%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%1.59%

Drawdowns

FVD vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVD drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVD and NOBL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-6.24%
-7.58%
FVD
NOBL

Volatility

FVD vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Value Line Dividend Index (FVD) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) have volatilities of 3.83% and 4.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.50%3.00%3.50%4.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
3.83%
4.00%
FVD
NOBL
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab