FV vs. ITOT
FV (First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF) and ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FV is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Focus Five Index, while ITOT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FV returned 13.45%/yr vs 15.01%/yr for ITOT. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FV charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ITOT.
Performance
FV vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FV achieves a 18.14% return, which is significantly higher than ITOT's 11.25% return. Over the past 10 years, FV has underperformed ITOT with an annualized return of 13.45%, while ITOT has yielded a comparatively higher 15.01% annualized return.
FV
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- 11.69%
- YTD
- 18.14%
- 6M
- 18.84%
- 1Y
- 28.90%
- 3Y*
- 18.88%
- 5Y*
- 10.37%
- 10Y*
- 13.45%
ITOT
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 11.25%
- 6M
- 11.12%
- 1Y
- 28.12%
- 3Y*
- 22.09%
- 5Y*
- 12.69%
- 10Y*
- 15.01%
FV vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FV First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF | 18.14% | 7.23% | 14.73% | 11.34% | -3.93% | 21.63% | 28.36% | 25.73% | -8.27% | 19.97% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 11.25% | 17.00% | 23.80% | 26.12% | -19.47% | 25.68% | 20.71% | 30.67% | -5.33% | 21.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between FV and ITOT is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2014 | 0.87 |
The correlation between FV and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
FV vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FV
ITOT
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Technology
FV
ITOT
Industrials
FV
ITOT
Financial Services
FV
ITOT
Healthcare
FV
ITOT
Energy
FV
ITOT
Consumer Cyclical
FV
ITOT
Communication Services
FV
ITOT
Real Estate
FV
ITOT
Basic Materials
FV
-
ITOT
Consumer Defensive
FV
-
ITOT
Utilities
FV
-
ITOT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FV vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank
FV
ITOT
FV vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FV | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.42 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 3.17 | -1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.12 | 14.57 | -6.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FV | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 2.32 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.74 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.82 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.57 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
FV vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FV drawdown since its inception was -34.04%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FV and ITOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FV | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.04% | -55.20% | +21.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.45% | -8.90% | -4.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.08% | -19.44% | -3.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.08% | -25.36% | +2.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.04% | -35.00% | +0.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.73% | +0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.80% | -6.97% | +1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.57% | 1.94% | +1.63% |
Volatility
FV vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) at 2.99%. This indicates that FV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FV | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.25% | 2.99% | +1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.54% | 9.13% | +3.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.22% | 12.20% | +3.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.76% | 17.36% | +3.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.42% | 18.26% | +3.16% |
FV vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FV has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
FV vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison
FV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than ITOT's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FV First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF | 0.52% | 0.63% | 0.14% | 0.47% | 1.38% | 0.11% | 0.06% | 0.56% | 0.19% | 0.67% | 0.95% | 0.14% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 0.98% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FV and ITOT have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FV has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to ITOT (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FV dropped -34.04% vs ITOT's -55.20%.
On 10-year performance, ITOT leads with 15.01% vs 13.45% for FV. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 15.01% return vs 13.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for FV.
ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.52% for FV.
FV is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ITOT is Large Cap Blend Equities. FV tracks Dorsey Wright Focus Five Index, while ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for FV and 0.03% for ITOT.
ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FV and ITOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer