PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FV vs. ITOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FV vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FV having a 11.82% return and ITOT slightly lower at 11.25%. Over the past 10 years, FV has underperformed ITOT with an annualized return of 12.44%, while ITOT has yielded a comparatively higher 14.63% annualized return.


FV

1D
-1.42%
1M
-2.89%
6M
4.99%
YTD
11.82%
1Y
18.75%
3Y*
13.79%
5Y*
9.67%
10Y*
12.44%

ITOT

1D
-0.50%
1M
0.35%
6M
9.08%
YTD
11.25%
1Y
21.93%
3Y*
19.69%
5Y*
12.32%
10Y*
14.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FV vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FV
First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF
11.82%7.23%14.73%11.34%-3.93%21.63%28.36%25.73%-8.27%19.97%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
11.25%17.00%23.80%26.12%-19.47%25.68%20.71%30.67%-5.33%21.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FV and ITOT is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2014

0.87

The correlation between FV and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

FV vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FV
ITOT

Energy

34.8%
3.3%

Technology

23.5%
37.2%

Healthcare

20.5%
8.8%

Financial Services

19.8%
11.4%

Industrials

13.9%
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%
9.8%

Communication Services

6.3%
9.8%

Real Estate

0.7%
2.3%

Basic Materials

-

2.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.3%

Utilities

-

2.1%

Energy

FV
34.8%
ITOT
3.3%

Technology

FV
23.5%
ITOT
37.2%

Healthcare

FV
20.5%
ITOT
8.8%

Financial Services

FV
19.8%
ITOT
11.4%

Industrials

FV
13.9%
ITOT
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FV
7.4%
ITOT
9.8%

Communication Services

FV
6.3%
ITOT
9.8%

Real Estate

FV
0.7%
ITOT
2.3%

Basic Materials

FV

-

ITOT
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

FV

-

ITOT
4.3%

Utilities

FV

-

ITOT
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FV vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FV
FV Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
FV Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FV Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FV vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FVITOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.31

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

2.48

-1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.01

10.79

-5.78

FV vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FV Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the ITOT Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FV and ITOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FV vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FV drawdown since its inception was -34.04%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FV and ITOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVITOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.04%

-55.20%

+21.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.45%

-8.90%

-4.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.08%

-19.44%

-3.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.08%

-25.36%

+2.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.04%

-35.00%

+0.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.45%

-0.73%

-6.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.80%

-6.94%

+1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.75%

2.04%

+1.71%

Volatility

FV vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) has a higher volatility of 7.70% compared to iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) at 3.31%. This indicates that FV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVITOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.70%

3.31%

+4.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.77%

10.15%

+4.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.32%

12.85%

+4.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.08%

17.46%

+3.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.52%

18.24%

+3.28%

FV vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FV has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FV vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

FV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than ITOT's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FV
First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF
0.52%0.63%0.14%0.47%1.38%0.11%0.06%0.56%0.19%0.67%0.95%0.14%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
1.00%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


FV and ITOT have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FV has higher volatility (7.70%) compared to ITOT (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FV dropped -34.04% vs ITOT's -55.20%.

On 10-year performance, ITOT leads with 14.63% vs 12.44% for FV. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 14.63% return vs 12.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for FV.

ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.52% for FV.

FV is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ITOT is Large Cap Blend Equities. FV tracks Dorsey Wright Focus Five Index, while ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for FV and 0.03% for ITOT.

ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FV and ITOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer