FV vs. COWZ
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ).
FV and COWZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FV is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Dorsey Wright Focus Five Index. It was launched on Mar 5, 2014. COWZ is a passively managed fund by Pacer Advisors that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2016. Both FV and COWZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FV or COWZ.
Correlation
The correlation between FV and COWZ is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Maximize Your Portfolio’s Potential
Does your portfolio have the optimal asset allocation aligned with your goals? Find it out with our portfolio optimizer
Try portfolio optimization nowPerformance
FV vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FV:
-0.31
COWZ:
-0.56
FV:
-0.28
COWZ:
-0.67
FV:
0.96
COWZ:
0.92
FV:
-0.40
COWZ:
-0.58
FV:
-1.20
COWZ:
-1.70
FV:
5.46%
COWZ:
5.03%
FV:
21.10%
COWZ:
15.33%
FV:
-34.04%
COWZ:
-38.63%
FV:
-16.39%
COWZ:
-14.78%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FV achieves a -10.77% return, which is significantly lower than COWZ's -7.82% return.
FV
-10.77%
-8.03%
-8.25%
-6.68%
16.90%
8.75%
COWZ
-7.82%
-5.83%
-9.66%
-8.95%
22.64%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FV vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FV has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FV vs. COWZ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FV
COWZ
FV vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FV vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison
FV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than COWZ's 1.96% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FV First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF | 0.28% | 0.14% | 0.48% | 1.38% | 0.11% | 0.06% | 0.56% | 0.19% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 0.14% | 0.10% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 2.08% | 1.82% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.94% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FV vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FV drawdown since its inception was -34.04%, smaller than the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FV and COWZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FV vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) has a higher volatility of 10.48% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 8.63%. This indicates that FV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
User Portfolios with FV or COWZ
Recent discussions
Dividend Paying Stock Portfolio
4803heights
Drawdowns and Data
Hi what data sources do you guys use for different ETF, and Mutual Data? Also are drawdowns calculated daily or monthly?
Thank You
Bee Zee
Dividends
Farshad