FUSA.L vs. SPYL.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUSA.L) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged Acc (SPYL.DE).
FUSA.L and SPYL.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FUSA.L is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity US Quality Income Index. It was launched on Jun 21, 2023. SPYL.DE is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P 500®. It was launched on Oct 31, 2023. Both FUSA.L and SPYL.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FUSA.L or SPYL.DE.
Correlation
The correlation between FUSA.L and SPYL.DE is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FUSA.L vs. SPYL.DE - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FUSA.L:
1.40
SPYL.DE:
2.21
FUSA.L:
2.01
SPYL.DE:
3.06
FUSA.L:
1.25
SPYL.DE:
1.44
FUSA.L:
2.60
SPYL.DE:
3.38
FUSA.L:
7.49
SPYL.DE:
14.72
FUSA.L:
2.28%
SPYL.DE:
1.89%
FUSA.L:
12.18%
SPYL.DE:
12.63%
FUSA.L:
-35.84%
SPYL.DE:
-8.25%
FUSA.L:
-1.87%
SPYL.DE:
-0.31%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FUSA.L achieves a 2.30% return, which is significantly lower than SPYL.DE's 3.51% return.
FUSA.L
2.30%
1.47%
4.91%
16.46%
11.65%
N/A
SPYL.DE
3.51%
0.56%
16.80%
26.96%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FUSA.L vs. SPYL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FUSA.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYL.DE's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FUSA.L vs. SPYL.DE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FUSA.L
SPYL.DE
FUSA.L vs. SPYL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUSA.L) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged Acc (SPYL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FUSA.L vs. SPYL.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither FUSA.L nor SPYL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
FUSA.L vs. SPYL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUSA.L drawdown since its inception was -35.84%, which is greater than SPYL.DE's maximum drawdown of -8.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUSA.L and SPYL.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FUSA.L vs. SPYL.DE - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUSA.L) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged Acc (SPYL.DE) at 3.36%. This indicates that FUSA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.