PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FURY vs. NEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FURY vs. NEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fury Gold Mines Limited (FURY) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FURY achieves a -12.90% return, which is significantly lower than NEM's -5.41% return. Over the past 10 years, FURY has underperformed NEM with an annualized return of -13.47%, while NEM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.44% annualized return.


FURY

1D
-1.15%
1M
-9.22%
YTD
-12.90%
6M
-19.32%
1Y
5.20%
3Y*
8.68%
5Y*
-15.46%
10Y*
-13.47%

NEM

1D
-3.88%
1M
-12.43%
YTD
-5.41%
6M
-9.82%
1Y
63.61%
3Y*
34.19%
5Y*
11.64%
10Y*
12.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FURY vs. NEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FURY
Fury Gold Mines Limited
-12.90%59.42%-26.92%18.68%-33.35%-55.54%-0.00%57.36%-44.20%-25.94%
NEM
Newmont Corporation
-5.41%172.82%-7.83%-8.76%-20.77%7.40%40.28%30.52%-6.15%10.91%

Correlation

The correlation between FURY and NEM is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2011

0.28

Over the past year, FURY and NEM have become more correlated (0.50) than their long-term average of 0.28, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

EPS

FURY:

-CA$0.06

NEM:

$6.34

Total Revenue (TTM)

FURY:

CA$0.00

NEM:

$17.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FURY:

-CA$79.11K

NEM:

$8.97B

EBITDA (TTM)

FURY:

-CA$6.42M

NEM:

$13.78B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FURY vs. NEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FURY
FURY Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FURY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FURY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FURY Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FURY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
FURY Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

NEM
NEM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
NEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
NEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FURY vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fury Gold Mines Limited (FURY) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FURYNEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.24

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.11

2.18

-2.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.19

5.62

-5.43

FURY vs. NEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FURY Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the NEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FURY and NEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FURY vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FURY drawdown since its inception was -90.16%, which is greater than NEM's maximum drawdown of -81.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FURY and NEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FURYNEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.16%

-81.30%

-8.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.85%

-29.39%

-17.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.85%

-36.57%

-10.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.58%

-62.40%

-12.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-90.16%

-62.40%

-27.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-83.69%

-28.42%

-55.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.19%

-41.36%

-12.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.61%

11.35%

+16.26%

Volatility

FURY vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fury Gold Mines Limited (FURY) is 12.99%, while Newmont Corporation (NEM) has a volatility of 16.16%. This indicates that FURY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FURYNEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.99%

16.16%

-3.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.32%

37.98%

+11.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

72.44%

47.95%

+24.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.55%

38.08%

+24.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.40%

35.73%

+26.67%

Dividends

FURY vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison

FURY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FURY
Fury Gold Mines Limited
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NEM
Newmont Corporation
1.08%1.00%2.69%3.87%4.66%3.55%1.74%3.31%1.62%0.67%0.37%0.56%

Financials

FURY vs. NEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fury Gold Mines Limited and Newmont Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B2022202320242025202600
(FURY) Total Revenue
(NEM) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. FURY values in CAD, NEM values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


FURY and NEM have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEM has higher volatility (16.16%) compared to FURY (12.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FURY dropped -90.16% vs NEM's -81.30%.

NEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FURY and NEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer