PortfoliosLab logo
FUND vs. UTF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FUND and UTF is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

FUND vs. UTF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Focus Trust, Inc. (FUND) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FUND:

0.02

UTF:

1.53

Sortino Ratio

FUND:

0.09

UTF:

1.80

Omega Ratio

FUND:

1.01

UTF:

1.26

Calmar Ratio

FUND:

-0.04

UTF:

1.85

Martin Ratio

FUND:

-0.11

UTF:

5.33

Ulcer Index

FUND:

5.87%

UTF:

4.16%

Daily Std Dev

FUND:

19.43%

UTF:

16.29%

Max Drawdown

FUND:

-65.37%

UTF:

-72.65%

Current Drawdown

FUND:

-8.48%

UTF:

0.00%

Fundamentals

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUND achieves a -0.17% return, which is significantly lower than UTF's 11.91% return. Over the past 10 years, FUND has underperformed UTF with an annualized return of 7.26%, while UTF has yielded a comparatively higher 10.03% annualized return.


FUND

YTD

-0.17%

1M

0.28%

6M

-7.24%

1Y

0.45%

3Y*

0.40%

5Y*

12.35%

10Y*

7.26%

UTF

YTD

11.91%

1M

3.27%

6M

3.52%

1Y

24.73%

3Y*

5.93%

5Y*

10.86%

10Y*

10.03%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Sprott Focus Trust, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FUND vs. UTF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUND
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FUND is 4545
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FUND is 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FUND is 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FUND is 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FUND is 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FUND is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

UTF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UTF is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UTF is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UTF is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UTF is 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UTF is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UTF is 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FUND vs. UTF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Focus Trust, Inc. (FUND) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FUND Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is lower than the UTF Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUND and UTF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

FUND vs. UTF - Dividend Comparison

FUND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.47%, more than UTF's 7.14% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FUND
Sprott Focus Trust, Inc.
8.47%8.27%6.22%6.73%8.79%7.93%6.30%11.92%6.57%5.76%7.59%5.78%
UTF
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc
7.14%7.74%8.76%7.75%6.53%7.20%7.10%10.12%7.37%10.51%8.39%6.51%

Drawdowns

FUND vs. UTF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUND drawdown since its inception was -65.37%, smaller than the maximum UTF drawdown of -72.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUND and UTF.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

FUND vs. UTF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sprott Focus Trust, Inc. (FUND) is 3.17%, while Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) has a volatility of 3.36%. This indicates that FUND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

FUND vs. UTF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sprott Focus Trust, Inc. and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


6.00M8.00M10.00M12.00M14.00M16.00MAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
10.62M
(FUND) Total Revenue
(UTF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items