FUAMX vs. FSRNX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUAMX) and Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund (FSRNX).
FUAMX is managed by Fidelity. FSRNX is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI US IMI Real Estate 25/25 Index. It was launched on Aug 9, 2011.
Performance
FUAMX vs. FSRNX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FUAMX vs. FSRNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUAMX Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund | -0.46% | 8.00% | 0.40% | 4.08% | -13.06% | -3.19% | 8.86% | 7.25% | 1.25% | -0.35% |
FSRNX Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund | -0.56% | 3.03% | 4.99% | 11.93% | -26.14% | 40.66% | -11.31% | 23.78% | -4.91% | 0.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FUAMX achieves a -0.46% return, which is significantly higher than FSRNX's -0.56% return.
FUAMX
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -2.50%
- YTD
- -0.46%
- 6M
- 0.44%
- 1Y
- 3.70%
- 3Y*
- 2.80%
- 5Y*
- -0.18%
- 10Y*
- —
FSRNX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -7.86%
- YTD
- -0.56%
- 6M
- -3.07%
- 1Y
- -0.02%
- 3Y*
- 5.74%
- 5Y*
- 2.79%
- 10Y*
- 3.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FUAMX vs. FSRNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FUAMX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FSRNX's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FUAMX vs. FSRNX — Risk / Return Rank
FUAMX
FSRNX
FUAMX vs. FSRNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUAMX) and Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund (FSRNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FUAMX | FSRNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.89 | 0.05 | +0.83 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.32 | 0.19 | +1.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.03 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 0.06 | +1.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.58 | 0.24 | +4.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FUAMX | FSRNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 0.05 | +0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | 0.15 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.32 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between FUAMX and FSRNX is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FUAMX vs. FSRNX - Dividend Comparison
FUAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, more than FSRNX's 2.79% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUAMX Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund | 3.36% | 3.52% | 3.58% | 2.20% | 1.24% | 1.76% | 2.90% | 2.16% | 2.23% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSRNX Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund | 2.79% | 2.77% | 2.86% | 2.84% | 2.66% | 1.25% | 3.33% | 4.52% | 3.62% | 2.27% | 3.40% | 2.57% |
Drawdowns
FUAMX vs. FSRNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUAMX drawdown since its inception was -20.25%, smaller than the maximum FSRNX drawdown of -44.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUAMX and FSRNX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FUAMX | FSRNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.25% | -44.26% | +24.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.10% | -12.45% | +9.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.27% | -34.27% | +16.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.87% | -11.07% | +4.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.33% | -9.77% | +2.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.08% | 3.18% | -2.10% |
Volatility
FUAMX vs. FSRNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUAMX) is 1.72%, while Fidelity Real Estate Index Fund (FSRNX) has a volatility of 4.21%. This indicates that FUAMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSRNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FUAMX | FSRNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.72% | 4.21% | -2.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.91% | 9.20% | -6.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.89% | 16.38% | -11.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.61% | 18.89% | -12.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.87% | 21.41% | -15.54% |