PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTXG vs. SWPPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTXG vs. SWPPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF (FTXG) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTXG achieves a 5.86% return, which is significantly lower than SWPPX's 11.69% return.


FTXG

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.85%
YTD
5.86%
6M
4.05%
1Y
0.33%
3Y*
-3.08%
5Y*
-1.45%
10Y*

SWPPX

1D
0.15%
1M
5.83%
YTD
11.69%
6M
11.71%
1Y
28.97%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTXG vs. SWPPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTXG
First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF
5.86%-6.52%-2.52%-6.48%6.15%13.48%6.63%23.97%-12.09%5.64%
SWPPX
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
11.69%17.87%24.96%26.26%-18.14%28.67%18.38%31.46%-4.47%21.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FTXG and SWPPX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2016

0.35

Over the past year, the correlation between FTXG and SWPPX has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FTXG vs. SWPPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTXG
SWPPX

Consumer Defensive

94.0%
4.9%

Basic Materials

4.3%
1.8%

Industrials

1.7%
8.3%

Communication Services

-

11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.1%

Energy

-

3.5%

Financial Services

-

11.8%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

-

35.6%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Consumer Defensive

FTXG
94.0%
SWPPX
4.9%

Basic Materials

FTXG
4.3%
SWPPX
1.8%

Industrials

FTXG
1.7%
SWPPX
8.3%

Communication Services

FTXG

-

SWPPX
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FTXG

-

SWPPX
10.1%

Energy

FTXG

-

SWPPX
3.5%

Financial Services

FTXG

-

SWPPX
11.8%

Healthcare

FTXG

-

SWPPX
8.5%

Real Estate

FTXG

-

SWPPX
1.9%

Technology

FTXG

-

SWPPX
35.6%

Utilities

FTXG

-

SWPPX
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTXG vs. SWPPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTXG
FTXG Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
FTXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTXG Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
FTXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTXG Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

SWPPX
SWPPX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SWPPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWPPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWPPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SWPPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWPPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTXG vs. SWPPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF (FTXG) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTXGSWPPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.46

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.03

3.36

-3.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.06

15.67

-15.61

FTXG vs. SWPPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTXG Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is lower than the SWPPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTXG and SWPPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTXGSWPPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

2.52

-2.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

0.85

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.51

-0.33

Drawdowns

FTXG vs. SWPPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTXG drawdown since its inception was -31.52%, smaller than the maximum SWPPX drawdown of -55.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXG and SWPPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTXGSWPPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.52%

-55.06%

+23.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.14%

-8.89%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.10%

-18.74%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.68%

-24.51%

+2.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.76%

0.00%

-14.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.64%

-9.95%

+2.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.40%

1.90%

+3.50%

Volatility

FTXG vs. SWPPX - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF (FTXG) has a higher volatility of 3.29% compared to Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX) at 2.83%. This indicates that FTXG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWPPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTXGSWPPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

2.83%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.62%

8.98%

+0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.60%

11.87%

+1.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.46%

16.93%

-2.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.63%

18.23%

-1.60%

FTXG vs. SWPPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTXG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SWPPX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTXG vs. SWPPX - Dividend Comparison

FTXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than SWPPX's 0.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTXG
First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF
2.75%2.93%2.75%4.27%1.50%1.52%1.35%1.25%1.37%1.56%0.30%0.00%
SWPPX
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
0.99%1.11%1.23%1.43%1.67%1.27%1.81%1.95%2.67%1.79%2.55%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTXG and SWPPX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTXG has higher volatility (3.29%) compared to SWPPX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTXG dropped -31.52% vs SWPPX's -55.06%.

SWPPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTXG and SWPPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer