FTSM vs. SCHO
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF (FTSM) and Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO).
FTSM and SCHO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FTSM is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Aug 5, 2014. SCHO is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Treasury (1-3 Y) (Inception 4/30/1996). It was launched on Aug 5, 2010.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FTSM or SCHO.
Key characteristics
| FTSM | SCHO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 4.53% | 4.46% |
| 1Y Return | 5.62% | 7.24% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 3.54% | 2.38% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 2.41% | 2.24% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 1.94% | 2.06% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 11.06 | 3.50 |
| Sortino Ratio | 28.30 | 6.21 |
| Omega Ratio | 6.29 | 1.85 |
| Calmar Ratio | 83.86 | 8.11 |
| Martin Ratio | 344.93 | 23.07 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.02% | 0.32% |
| Daily Std Dev | 0.51% | 2.09% |
| Max Drawdown | -4.12% | -5.28% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.03% | -0.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTSM and SCHO is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FTSM vs. SCHO - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FTSM having a 4.53% return and SCHO slightly lower at 4.46%. Over the past 10 years, FTSM has underperformed SCHO with an annualized return of 1.94%, while SCHO has yielded a comparatively higher 2.06% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FTSM vs. SCHO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTSM has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHO's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FTSM vs. SCHO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF (FTSM) and Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FTSM vs. SCHO - Dividend Comparison
FTSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, less than SCHO's 5.36% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTSM First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF | 4.96% | 4.62% | 1.62% | 0.39% | 1.20% | 2.38% | 2.15% | 1.38% | 1.03% | 0.48% | 0.19% | 0.00% |
SCHO Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 5.36% | 5.03% | 2.12% | 0.57% | 2.14% | 3.40% | 2.89% | 1.55% | 1.23% | 0.97% | 0.59% | 0.44% |
Drawdowns
FTSM vs. SCHO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTSM drawdown since its inception was -4.12%, smaller than the maximum SCHO drawdown of -5.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTSM and SCHO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FTSM vs. SCHO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF (FTSM) is 0.12%, while Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) has a volatility of 0.36%. This indicates that FTSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.