PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTSD vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTSD vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF (FTSD) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTSD achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, FTSD has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 2.05%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.


FTSD

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.80%
6M
1.30%
1Y
4.31%
3Y*
4.98%
5Y*
2.46%
10Y*
2.05%

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTSD vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTSD
Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF
0.80%5.66%5.20%4.84%-3.13%-0.90%3.13%2.40%1.64%0.63%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FTSD and VOO is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2013

-0.02

The correlation between FTSD and VOO shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (10 years) to 0.13 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTSD vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTSD
FTSD Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FTSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTSD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FTSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTSD Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTSD vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF (FTSD) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTSDVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.43

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.59

3.16

+6.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

38.36

14.73

+23.64

FTSD vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTSD Sharpe Ratio is 3.30, which is higher than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTSD and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTSDVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.30

2.39

+0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.33

0.83

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.15

0.87

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

0.89

+0.16

Drawdowns

FTSD vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTSD drawdown since its inception was -5.32%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTSD and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTSDVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

-33.99%

+28.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.45%

-8.90%

+8.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.93%

-18.69%

+17.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.04%

-24.52%

+19.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.32%

-33.99%

+28.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.70%

+0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.60%

-3.69%

+3.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.11%

1.91%

-1.80%

Volatility

FTSD vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF (FTSD) is 0.51%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that FTSD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTSDVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.51%

2.84%

-2.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.03%

8.90%

-7.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31%

11.80%

-10.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.85%

16.81%

-14.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.79%

18.01%

-16.22%

FTSD vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTSD has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FTSD vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

FTSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTSD
Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF
4.50%4.67%4.75%4.14%1.73%1.01%1.54%2.90%2.63%2.24%1.92%1.52%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTSD and VOO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to FTSD (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTSD dropped -5.32% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.56% vs 2.05% for FTSD. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FTSD has been the lower-risk option at 0.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.56% return vs 2.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FTSD.

FTSD has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.

FTSD is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FTSD and 0.03% for VOO.

FTSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTSD and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer