FTS.TO vs. AEM.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Fortis Inc. (FTS.TO) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FTS.TO or AEM.TO.
Key characteristics
| FTS.TO | AEM.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 16.65% | 48.57% |
| 1Y Return | 14.03% | 64.37% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.34% | 16.83% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 6.82% | 8.75% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 8.99% | 15.90% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.18 | 2.47 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.79 | 3.09 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.21 | 1.40 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.02 | 1.62 |
| Martin Ratio | 4.49 | 12.75 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.48% | 5.38% |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.25% | 27.80% |
| Max Drawdown | -41.48% | -84.31% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.79% | -13.99% |
Fundamentals
| FTS.TO | AEM.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | CA$30.70B | CA$54.57B |
| EPS | CA$3.23 | CA$2.72 |
| PE Ratio | 19.11 | 39.54 |
| PEG Ratio | 3.01 | 28.26 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | CA$11.44B | CA$7.82B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | CA$5.63B | CA$3.18B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | CA$3.83B | CA$2.89B |
Correlation
The correlation between FTS.TO and AEM.TO is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FTS.TO vs. AEM.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FTS.TO achieves a 16.65% return, which is significantly lower than AEM.TO's 48.57% return. Over the past 10 years, FTS.TO has underperformed AEM.TO with an annualized return of 8.99%, while AEM.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.90% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FTS.TO vs. AEM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortis Inc. (FTS.TO) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FTS.TO vs. AEM.TO - Dividend Comparison
FTS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, more than AEM.TO's 1.50% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTS.TO Fortis Inc. | 3.83% | 4.22% | 4.04% | 3.38% | 3.75% | 3.39% | 3.79% | 3.52% | 3.68% | 3.73% | 3.29% | 4.07% |
AEM.TO Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 1.50% | 2.20% | 2.27% | 2.71% | 1.06% | 0.69% | 0.80% | 0.71% | 0.82% | 0.88% | 1.42% | 3.97% |
Drawdowns
FTS.TO vs. AEM.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTS.TO drawdown since its inception was -41.48%, smaller than the maximum AEM.TO drawdown of -84.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTS.TO and AEM.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FTS.TO vs. AEM.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fortis Inc. (FTS.TO) is 4.85%, while Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO) has a volatility of 10.82%. This indicates that FTS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AEM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
FTS.TO vs. AEM.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fortis Inc. and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities