FTQI vs. QDPL
FTQI (First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF) and QDPL (Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while QDPL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Pacer. FTQI is passively managed, while QDPL is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FTQI returned 17.12%/yr vs 20.64%/yr for QDPL. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FTQI charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QDPL.
Performance
FTQI vs. QDPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FTQI having a 10.78% return and QDPL slightly lower at 10.40%.
FTQI
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 4.10%
- YTD
- 10.78%
- 6M
- 11.65%
- 1Y
- 28.18%
- 3Y*
- 17.12%
- 5Y*
- 10.92%
- 10Y*
- 8.07%
QDPL
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 5.23%
- YTD
- 10.40%
- 6M
- 10.54%
- 1Y
- 26.37%
- 3Y*
- 20.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTQI vs. QDPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF | 10.78% | 12.68% | 18.30% | 23.63% | -8.77% | 3.30% |
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF | 10.40% | 16.52% | 22.83% | 23.66% | -16.25% | 8.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTQI and QDPL is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2021 | 0.83 |
The correlation between FTQI and QDPL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
FTQI vs. QDPL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTQI
QDPL
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Technology
FTQI
QDPL
Financial Services
FTQI
QDPL
Consumer Cyclical
FTQI
QDPL
Healthcare
FTQI
QDPL
Energy
FTQI
QDPL
Industrials
FTQI
QDPL
Consumer Defensive
FTQI
QDPL
Basic Materials
FTQI
QDPL
Utilities
FTQI
QDPL
Communication Services
FTQI
QDPL
Real Estate
FTQI
QDPL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTQI vs. QDPL — Risk / Return Rank
FTQI
QDPL
FTQI vs. QDPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTQI | QDPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.41 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.54 | 3.06 | +1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.02 | 14.37 | +7.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTQI | QDPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.74 | 2.23 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.83 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
FTQI vs. QDPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTQI drawdown since its inception was -19.42%, smaller than the maximum QDPL drawdown of -22.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTQI and QDPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTQI | QDPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.42% | -22.59% | +3.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.24% | -8.65% | +2.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.42% | -17.75% | -1.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.65% | +0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.76% | -5.14% | +1.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.28% | 1.84% | -0.56% |
Volatility
FTQI vs. QDPL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI) is 1.66%, while Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) has a volatility of 2.69%. This indicates that FTQI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTQI | QDPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.66% | 2.69% | -1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.24% | 9.00% | -0.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.33% | 11.89% | -1.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.81% | 15.01% | -0.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.36% | 15.01% | -1.65% |
FTQI vs. QDPL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTQI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QDPL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTQI vs. QDPL - Dividend Comparison
FTQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.96%, more than QDPL's 5.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF | 10.96% | 11.46% | 11.66% | 11.49% | 9.85% | 3.05% | 3.27% | 2.95% | 3.27% | 2.74% | 3.02% | 3.54% |
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF | 5.05% | 4.84% | 5.43% | 6.30% | 7.27% | 2.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTQI and QDPL have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QDPL has higher volatility (2.69%) compared to FTQI (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTQI dropped -19.42% vs QDPL's -22.59%.
On 3-year performance, QDPL leads with 20.64% vs 17.12% for FTQI. On fees, QDPL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FTQI has been the lower-risk option at 1.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QDPL has performed better with a 20.64% return vs 17.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QDPL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FTQI.
FTQI has the higher dividend yield at 10.96%, compared with 5.05% for QDPL.
FTQI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while QDPL is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FTQI and 0.60% for QDPL.
FTQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTQI and QDPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer