PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTQI vs. QDPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTQI vs. QDPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTQI achieves a 12.31% return, which is significantly higher than QDPL's 10.98% return.


FTQI

1D
0.78%
1M
0.51%
6M
10.29%
YTD
12.31%
1Y
24.78%
3Y*
16.87%
5Y*
12.04%
10Y*
8.22%
ALL TIME*
7.02%

QDPL

1D
1.46%
1M
1.44%
6M
9.21%
YTD
10.98%
1Y
21.91%
3Y*
19.28%
5Y*
12.06%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.49M$8.85M$6.01M
$5.42M$5.30M$6.18M

FTQI vs. QDPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FTQI
First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF
12.31%12.68%18.30%23.63%-8.77%2.32%
QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
10.98%16.52%22.83%23.66%-16.25%7.82%

Correlation

The correlation between FTQI and QDPL is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2021

0.83

The correlation between FTQI and QDPL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

FTQI vs. QDPL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTQI
QDPL

Technology

47.4%
31.0%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
7.2%

Communication Services

8.5%
7.6%

Healthcare

7.6%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

7.4%
3.8%

Industrials

6.3%
6.3%

Financial Services

5.2%
10.0%

Energy

2.2%
2.8%

Utilities

1.5%
2.2%

Real Estate

1.1%
1.6%

Basic Materials

1.1%
1.5%

Technology

FTQI
47.4%
QDPL
31.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FTQI
11.6%
QDPL
7.2%

Communication Services

FTQI
8.5%
QDPL
7.6%

Healthcare

FTQI
7.6%
QDPL
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

FTQI
7.4%
QDPL
3.8%

Industrials

FTQI
6.3%
QDPL
6.3%

Financial Services

FTQI
5.2%
QDPL
10.0%

Energy

FTQI
2.2%
QDPL
2.8%

Utilities

FTQI
1.5%
QDPL
2.2%

Real Estate

FTQI
1.1%
QDPL
1.6%

Basic Materials

FTQI
1.1%
QDPL
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTQI vs. QDPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FTQI
FTQI Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FTQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTQI Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FTQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTQI Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

QDPL
QDPL Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
QDPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDPL Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QDPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FTQI vs. QDPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTQIQDPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.31

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.99

2.55

+1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.99

10.97

+7.01

FTQI vs. QDPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTQI Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the QDPL Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTQI and QDPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTQI vs. QDPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTQI drawdown since its inception was -19.42%, smaller than the maximum QDPL drawdown of -22.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTQI and QDPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTQIQDPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.42%

-22.59%

+3.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.24%

-8.65%

+2.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.42%

-17.75%

-1.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.42%

-22.59%

+3.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

-0.13%

-1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-5.04%

+1.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.38%

2.00%

-0.62%

Volatility

FTQI vs. QDPL - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI) has a higher volatility of 3.67% compared to Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) at 3.35%. This indicates that FTQI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTQIQDPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

3.35%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.09%

10.01%

-0.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.23%

12.65%

-1.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.79%

15.04%

-0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.93%

15.00%

-2.07%

FTQI vs. QDPL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTQI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QDPL's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTQI vs. QDPL - Dividend Comparison

FTQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.20%, more than QDPL's 4.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTQI
First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF
11.20%11.46%11.66%11.49%9.85%3.05%3.27%2.95%3.27%2.74%3.02%3.54%
QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
4.51%4.84%5.43%6.30%7.27%2.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTQI and QDPL have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTQI has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to QDPL (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTQI dropped -19.42% vs QDPL's -22.59%.

On 5-year performance, QDPL leads with 12.06% vs 12.04% for FTQI. On fees, QDPL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QDPL has been the lower-risk option at 3.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QDPL has performed better with a 12.06% return vs 12.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QDPL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FTQI.

FTQI has the higher dividend yield at 11.20%, compared with 4.51% for QDPL.

FTQI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while QDPL is Large Cap Blend Equities. FTQI tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while QDPL tracks Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Index - Series 400. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FTQI and 0.60% for QDPL.

FTQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTQI and QDPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer