PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTFT vs. MSFT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FTFT vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTFT achieves a -78.61% return, which is significantly lower than MSFT's -22.33% return. Over the past 10 years, FTFT has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of -48.45%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 23.85% annualized return.


FTFT

1D
-5.51%
1M
-43.59%
YTD
-78.61%
6M
-82.81%
1Y
-84.29%
3Y*
-77.24%
5Y*
-74.79%
10Y*
-48.45%

MSFT

1D
1.80%
1M
-10.66%
YTD
-22.33%
6M
-22.85%
1Y
-22.44%
3Y*
4.54%
5Y*
7.88%
10Y*
23.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTFT vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTFT
Future FinTech Group Inc.
-78.61%-75.11%-83.07%-1.61%-72.03%-29.26%317.78%-25.62%-85.49%-36.82%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-22.33%15.58%12.93%58.19%-28.02%52.48%42.53%57.56%20.80%40.73%

Correlation

The correlation between FTFT and MSFT is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2005

0.09

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FTFT:

$3.41M

MSFT:

$2.78T

EPS

FTFT:

-$0.33

MSFT:

$16.79

PS Ratio

FTFT:

0.76

MSFT:

8.76

PB Ratio

FTFT:

0.08

MSFT:

6.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

FTFT:

$3.49M

MSFT:

$318.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FTFT:

$250.24K

MSFT:

$217.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

FTFT:

-$4.43M

MSFT:

$200.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Future FinTech Group Inc.

Microsoft Corporation

Return for Risk

FTFT vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTFT
FTFT Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
FTFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTFT Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FTFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTFT Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFT
MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTFT vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTFTMSFTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

0.86

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.88

-0.66

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.16

-1.32

+0.15

FTFT vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTFT Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is higher than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTFT and MSFT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTFT vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTFT drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTFT and MSFT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTFTMSFTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.99%

-69.38%

-30.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-95.81%

-33.91%

-61.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.19%

-33.91%

-65.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.90%

-37.15%

-62.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.98%

-37.15%

-62.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.99%

-30.58%

-69.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-80.39%

-21.79%

-58.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

72.51%

17.08%

+55.43%

Volatility

FTFT vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT) has a higher volatility of 27.32% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 11.34%. This indicates that FTFT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTFTMSFTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.32%

11.34%

+15.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

74.41%

22.94%

+51.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

195.28%

26.02%

+169.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

122.30%

26.79%

+95.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

158.93%

27.09%

+131.84%

Dividends

FTFT vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

FTFT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTFT
Future FinTech Group Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.95%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%

Financials

FTFT vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Future FinTech Group Inc. and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
212.61K
82.89B
(FTFT) Total Revenue
(MSFT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


FTFT and MSFT have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTFT has higher volatility (27.32%) compared to MSFT (11.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTFT dropped -99.99% vs MSFT's -69.38%.

FTFT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.43 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTFT and MSFT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer