FTFT vs. BULZ
Compare and contrast key facts about Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ).
BULZ is a passively managed fund by BMO Financial Group that tracks the performance of the Solactive FANG Innovation. It was launched on Aug 17, 2021.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FTFT or BULZ.
Key characteristics
| FTFT | BULZ | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -82.51% | 64.20% |
| 1Y Return | -59.83% | 131.44% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -68.61% | -20.09% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.59 | 1.87 |
| Sortino Ratio | -0.63 | 2.22 |
| Omega Ratio | 0.93 | 1.30 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.58 | 1.67 |
| Martin Ratio | -0.92 | 6.66 |
| Ulcer Index | 62.98% | 19.82% |
| Daily Std Dev | 97.55% | 70.47% |
| Max Drawdown | -99.90% | -94.44% |
| Current Drawdown | -99.89% | -50.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTFT and BULZ is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FTFT vs. BULZ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FTFT achieves a -82.51% return, which is significantly lower than BULZ's 64.20% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FTFT vs. BULZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FTFT vs. BULZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither FTFT nor BULZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
FTFT vs. BULZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTFT drawdown since its inception was -99.90%, which is greater than BULZ's maximum drawdown of -94.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTFT and BULZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FTFT vs. BULZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT) is 14.29%, while MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) has a volatility of 21.79%. This indicates that FTFT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BULZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.