FTFT vs. BULZ
Compare and contrast key facts about Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ).
BULZ is a passively managed fund by BMO Financial Group that tracks the performance of the Solactive FANG Innovation. It was launched on Aug 17, 2021.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FTFT or BULZ.
Correlation
The correlation between FTFT and BULZ is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FTFT vs. BULZ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FTFT:
-0.63
BULZ:
0.80
FTFT:
-0.82
BULZ:
1.41
FTFT:
0.91
BULZ:
1.18
FTFT:
-0.61
BULZ:
0.82
FTFT:
-1.03
BULZ:
2.82
FTFT:
58.86%
BULZ:
20.89%
FTFT:
95.71%
BULZ:
73.17%
FTFT:
-99.91%
BULZ:
-94.44%
FTFT:
-99.88%
BULZ:
-51.15%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTFT achieves a 7.94% return, which is significantly higher than BULZ's 4.28% return.
FTFT
7.94%
10.98%
-26.50%
-63.69%
-39.20%
-39.02%
BULZ
4.28%
-0.69%
5.06%
42.14%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FTFT vs. BULZ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FTFT
BULZ
FTFT vs. BULZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FTFT vs. BULZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither FTFT nor BULZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
FTFT vs. BULZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTFT drawdown since its inception was -99.91%, which is greater than BULZ's maximum drawdown of -94.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTFT and BULZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FTFT vs. BULZ - Volatility Comparison
Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT) has a higher volatility of 34.03% compared to MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) at 24.12%. This indicates that FTFT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BULZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.