PortfoliosLab logo
FTFMX vs. RMUNX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FTFMX and RMUNX is 0.00, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FTFMX vs. RMUNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity New York Municipal Income Fund (FTFMX) and Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund (RMUNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FTFMX:

0.31

RMUNX:

-0.15

Sortino Ratio

FTFMX:

0.37

RMUNX:

-0.24

Omega Ratio

FTFMX:

1.06

RMUNX:

0.96

Calmar Ratio

FTFMX:

0.22

RMUNX:

-0.16

Martin Ratio

FTFMX:

0.70

RMUNX:

-0.62

Ulcer Index

FTFMX:

2.15%

RMUNX:

3.17%

Daily Std Dev

FTFMX:

5.87%

RMUNX:

8.81%

Max Drawdown

FTFMX:

-19.44%

RMUNX:

-36.54%

Current Drawdown

FTFMX:

-4.39%

RMUNX:

-9.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTFMX achieves a -1.85% return, which is significantly higher than RMUNX's -4.80% return. Over the past 10 years, FTFMX has underperformed RMUNX with an annualized return of 1.95%, while RMUNX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.21% annualized return.


FTFMX

YTD

-1.85%

1M

-0.58%

6M

-3.42%

1Y

1.83%

3Y*

1.65%

5Y*

0.67%

10Y*

1.95%

RMUNX

YTD

-4.80%

1M

-1.94%

6M

-6.81%

1Y

-1.31%

3Y*

0.41%

5Y*

0.88%

10Y*

3.21%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FTFMX vs. RMUNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTFMX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than RMUNX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FTFMX vs. RMUNX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTFMX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FTFMX is 2222
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FTFMX is 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FTFMX is 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FTFMX is 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FTFMX is 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FTFMX is 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

RMUNX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RMUNX is 44
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RMUNX is 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RMUNX is 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RMUNX is 33
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RMUNX is 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RMUNX is 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FTFMX vs. RMUNX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity New York Municipal Income Fund (FTFMX) and Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund (RMUNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FTFMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is higher than the RMUNX Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTFMX and RMUNX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

FTFMX vs. RMUNX - Dividend Comparison

FTFMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, less than RMUNX's 4.46% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FTFMX
Fidelity New York Municipal Income Fund
2.89%2.80%2.63%2.62%2.87%2.77%2.86%3.01%3.64%3.97%4.05%3.42%
RMUNX
Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund
4.46%4.11%3.78%3.64%3.25%3.29%3.23%3.40%4.78%6.01%6.56%11.00%

Drawdowns

FTFMX vs. RMUNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTFMX drawdown since its inception was -19.44%, smaller than the maximum RMUNX drawdown of -36.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTFMX and RMUNX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

FTFMX vs. RMUNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity New York Municipal Income Fund (FTFMX) is 0.80%, while Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund (RMUNX) has a volatility of 1.21%. This indicates that FTFMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMUNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...