FTFMX vs. RMUNX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FTFMX (Fidelity New York Municipal Income Fund) and RMUNX (Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, FTFMX returned 2.00%/yr vs 3.73%/yr for RMUNX. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTFMX charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for RMUNX.

Performance

FTFMX vs. RMUNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity New York Municipal Income Fund (FTFMX) and Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund (RMUNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FTFMX having a 1.48% return and RMUNX slightly higher at 1.50%. Over the past 10 years, FTFMX has underperformed RMUNX with an annualized return of 2.00%, while RMUNX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.73% annualized return.

FTFMX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 1.48%
• 6M: 2.00%
• 1Y: 7.68%
• 3Y*: 4.24%
• 5Y*: 0.84%
• 10Y*: 2.00%

RMUNX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 1.50%
• 6M: 1.76%
• 1Y: 6.04%
• 3Y*: 3.30%
• 5Y*: 0.01%
• 10Y*: 3.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTFMX vs. RMUNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FTFMX Fidelity New York Municipal Income Fund	1.48%	5.12%	1.52%	7.51%	-11.16%	2.39%	4.15%	7.73%	0.35%	5.31%
RMUNX Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund	1.50%	0.82%	2.37%	9.85%	-15.09%	6.83%	5.84%	13.22%	8.89%	3.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FTFMX and RMUNX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1990	0.71

The correlation between FTFMX and RMUNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (all time) to 0.93 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FTFMX vs. RMUNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTFMX

FTFMX Risk / Return Rank: 59
FTFMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FTFMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
FTFMX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FTFMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
FTFMX Martin Ratio Rank: 35

RMUNX

RMUNX Risk / Return Rank: 19
RMUNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
RMUNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
RMUNX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
RMUNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
RMUNX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTFMX vs. RMUNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity New York Municipal Income Fund (FTFMX) and Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund (RMUNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FTFMX	RMUNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.39	1.36	+1.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.62	2.09	+1.53
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.28	+0.27
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.29	1.25	+1.03
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.95	3.30	+4.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FTFMX vs. RMUNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTFMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is higher than the RMUNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTFMX and RMUNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FTFMX	RMUNX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.39	1.36	+1.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19	0.00	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	0.63	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.13	1.04	+0.09

Drawdowns

FTFMX vs. RMUNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTFMX drawdown since its inception was -22.72%, smaller than the maximum RMUNX drawdown of -36.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTFMX and RMUNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTFMX	RMUNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.72%	-36.55%	+13.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.31%	-3.29%	-0.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.46%	-10.10%	+3.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.10%	-21.81%	+5.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-16.10%	-21.81%	+5.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.82%	-2.35%	+1.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.50%	-3.25%	+0.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.95%	1.69%	-0.74%

Volatility

FTFMX vs. RMUNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity New York Municipal Income Fund (FTFMX) is 1.27%, while Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund (RMUNX) has a volatility of 1.68%. This indicates that FTFMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMUNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTFMX	RMUNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.27%	1.68%	-0.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.40%	3.12%	-0.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.12%	4.51%	-1.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.37%	6.64%	-2.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.28%	6.00%	-1.72%

FTFMX vs. RMUNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTFMX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than RMUNX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTFMX vs. RMUNX - Dividend Comparison

FTFMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, less than RMUNX's 3.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTFMX Fidelity New York Municipal Income Fund	2.93%	3.78%	2.81%	2.63%	1.79%	2.52%	2.78%	2.87%	2.87%	3.64%	4.25%	3.79%
RMUNX Invesco Rochester New York Municipals Fund	3.14%	5.30%	4.81%	3.77%	3.03%	3.24%	3.32%	3.43%	3.40%	4.34%	6.01%	6.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTFMX and RMUNX in my portfolio?

FTFMX and RMUNX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTFMX or RMUNX?

RMUNX has higher volatility (1.68%) compared to FTFMX (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTFMX dropped -22.72% vs RMUNX's -36.55%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTFMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.