PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTFMX vs. BND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTFMX vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity New York Municipal Income Fund (FTFMX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTFMX achieves a 1.73% return, which is significantly higher than BND's 0.27% return. Over the past 10 years, FTFMX has outperformed BND with an annualized return of 2.02%, while BND has yielded a comparatively lower 1.58% annualized return.


FTFMX

1D
0.24%
1M
0.82%
YTD
1.73%
6M
2.16%
1Y
8.03%
3Y*
4.32%
5Y*
0.89%
10Y*
2.02%

BND

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.27%
YTD
0.27%
6M
0.12%
1Y
5.11%
3Y*
3.96%
5Y*
0.09%
10Y*
1.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTFMX vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTFMX
Fidelity New York Municipal Income Fund
1.73%5.12%1.52%7.51%-11.16%2.39%4.15%7.73%0.35%5.31%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
0.27%7.08%1.38%5.65%-13.11%-1.86%7.71%8.84%-0.12%3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between FTFMX and BND is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2007

0.48

The correlation between FTFMX and BND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTFMX vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTFMX
FTFMX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FTFMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTFMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTFMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FTFMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTFMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

BND
BND Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTFMX vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity New York Municipal Income Fund (FTFMX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTFMXBNDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.56

1.36

+1.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.89

2.03

+1.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.24

+0.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

1.92

+0.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.33

5.80

+2.53

FTFMX vs. BND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTFMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is higher than the BND Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTFMX and BND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTFMXBNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

1.36

+1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.01

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.29

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.13

0.59

+0.54

Drawdowns

FTFMX vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTFMX drawdown since its inception was -22.72%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTFMX and BND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTFMXBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.72%

-18.58%

-4.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.31%

-2.68%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.46%

-5.92%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.10%

-17.91%

+1.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.10%

-18.58%

+2.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-2.37%

+1.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.50%

-3.06%

+0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

0.88%

+0.07%

Volatility

FTFMX vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity New York Municipal Income Fund (FTFMX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) have volatilities of 1.28% and 1.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTFMXBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.28%

1.23%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.39%

2.66%

-0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.12%

3.78%

-0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.37%

6.02%

-1.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.28%

5.53%

-1.25%

FTFMX vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTFMX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTFMX vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

FTFMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, less than BND's 3.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
3.97%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%
FTFMX
Fidelity New York Municipal Income Fund
2.92%3.78%2.81%2.63%1.79%2.52%2.78%2.87%2.87%3.64%4.25%3.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTFMX and BND have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTFMX has higher volatility (1.28%) compared to BND (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTFMX dropped -22.72% vs BND's -18.58%.

FTFMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTFMX and BND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer