PortfoliosLab logo
FTCI vs. BEEM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FTCI and BEEM is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FTCI vs. BEEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FTC Solar, Inc. (FTCI) and Beam Global (BEEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FTCI:

-0.10

BEEM:

-0.92

Sortino Ratio

FTCI:

0.98

BEEM:

-1.88

Omega Ratio

FTCI:

1.11

BEEM:

0.80

Calmar Ratio

FTCI:

-0.21

BEEM:

-0.75

Martin Ratio

FTCI:

-0.47

BEEM:

-1.37

Ulcer Index

FTCI:

43.26%

BEEM:

53.78%

Daily Std Dev

FTCI:

156.68%

BEEM:

79.54%

Max Drawdown

FTCI:

-98.56%

BEEM:

-98.17%

Current Drawdown

FTCI:

-97.12%

BEEM:

-97.82%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FTCI:

$53.78M

BEEM:

$26.66M

EPS

FTCI:

-$3.71

BEEM:

-$1.49

PS Ratio

FTCI:

0.97

BEEM:

0.65

PB Ratio

FTCI:

3.46

BEEM:

0.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

FTCI:

$55.57M

BEEM:

$41.10M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FTCI:

-$13.93M

BEEM:

$6.32M

EBITDA (TTM)

FTCI:

-$44.85M

BEEM:

-$16.65M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTCI achieves a -25.41% return, which is significantly higher than BEEM's -49.21% return.


FTCI

YTD

-25.41%

1M

23.80%

6M

30.52%

1Y

-20.67%

3Y*

-53.36%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BEEM

YTD

-49.21%

1M

13.38%

6M

-58.40%

1Y

-72.34%

3Y*

-51.70%

5Y*

-27.40%

10Y*

-12.33%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FTC Solar, Inc.

Beam Global

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FTCI vs. BEEM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTCI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FTCI is 4949
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FTCI is 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FTCI is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FTCI is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FTCI is 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FTCI is 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

BEEM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BEEM is 66
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BEEM is 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BEEM is 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BEEM is 55
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BEEM is 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BEEM is 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FTCI vs. BEEM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FTC Solar, Inc. (FTCI) and Beam Global (BEEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FTCI Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is higher than the BEEM Sharpe Ratio of -0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTCI and BEEM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

FTCI vs. BEEM - Dividend Comparison

Neither FTCI nor BEEM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FTCI vs. BEEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTCI drawdown since its inception was -98.56%, roughly equal to the maximum BEEM drawdown of -98.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTCI and BEEM.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

FTCI vs. BEEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FTC Solar, Inc. (FTCI) is 22.74%, while Beam Global (BEEM) has a volatility of 29.47%. This indicates that FTCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BEEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

FTCI vs. BEEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FTC Solar, Inc. and Beam Global. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M100.00M20212022202320242025
20.80M
6.32M
(FTCI) Total Revenue
(BEEM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items