FTCI vs. BEEM
FTCI (FTC Solar, Inc.) and BEEM (Beam Global) are both stocks. Both operate in the Solar industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 5 years, FTCI returned -47.33%/yr vs -48.78%/yr for BEEM. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FTCI vs. BEEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTCI achieves a -51.97% return, which is significantly lower than BEEM's -7.33% return.
FTCI
- 1D
- 1.95%
- 1M
- 6.07%
- YTD
- -51.97%
- 6M
- -54.36%
- 1Y
- 23.00%
- 3Y*
- -40.91%
- 5Y*
- -47.33%
- 10Y*
- —
BEEM
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- -2.80%
- YTD
- -7.33%
- 6M
- -20.11%
- 1Y
- -4.14%
- 3Y*
- -49.08%
- 5Y*
- -48.78%
- 10Y*
- -15.23%
FTCI vs. BEEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTCI FTC Solar, Inc. | -51.97% | 98.00% | -20.47% | -74.15% | -64.55% | -50.30% |
BEEM Beam Global | -7.33% | -52.68% | -55.29% | -59.42% | -6.08% | -46.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTCI and BEEM is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2021 | 0.37 |
Fundamentals
FTCI:
$117.36M
BEEM:
$23.37M
FTCI:
-$2.47
BEEM:
-$1.62
FTCI:
0.89
BEEM:
0.82
FTCI:
$96.15M
BEEM:
$28.24M
FTCI:
$3.35M
BEEM:
$3.52M
FTCI:
-$51.30M
BEEM:
-$13.13M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTCI vs. BEEM — Risk / Return Rank
FTCI
BEEM
FTCI vs. BEEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FTC Solar, Inc. (FTCI) and Beam Global (BEEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTCI | BEEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.08 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.32 | -0.06 | +0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.62 | -0.09 | +0.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTCI vs. BEEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTCI drawdown since its inception was -98.65%, roughly equal to the maximum BEEM drawdown of -98.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTCI and BEEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTCI | BEEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.65% | -98.50% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.40% | -71.39% | -1.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -94.60% | -91.05% | -3.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.46% | -97.27% | -1.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -98.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.55% | -98.12% | +1.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.09% | -75.78% | -6.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.91% | 47.02% | -10.11% |
Volatility
FTCI vs. BEEM - Volatility Comparison
FTC Solar, Inc. (FTCI) has a higher volatility of 27.30% compared to Beam Global (BEEM) at 21.17%. This indicates that FTCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BEEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTCI | BEEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.30% | 21.17% | +6.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 84.25% | 58.35% | +25.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 110.24% | 98.13% | +12.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 118.43% | 84.57% | +33.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 117.58% | 89.69% | +27.89% |
Dividends
FTCI vs. BEEM - Dividend Comparison
Neither FTCI nor BEEM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
FTCI vs. BEEM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FTC Solar, Inc. and Beam Global. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
FTCI and BEEM have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTCI has higher volatility (27.30%) compared to BEEM (21.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTCI dropped -98.65% vs BEEM's -98.50%.
FTCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.21 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTCI and BEEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer