PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTAI vs. CBOE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FTAI vs. CBOE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC (FTAI) and Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTAI achieves a 27.48% return, which is significantly higher than CBOE's 14.48% return. Over the past 10 years, FTAI has outperformed CBOE with an annualized return of 45.19%, while CBOE has yielded a comparatively lower 17.91% annualized return.


FTAI

1D
1.25%
1M
2.51%
YTD
27.48%
6M
42.71%
1Y
105.20%
3Y*
109.36%
5Y*
58.91%
10Y*
45.19%

CBOE

1D
0.33%
1M
-16.67%
YTD
14.48%
6M
12.72%
1Y
29.18%
3Y*
29.92%
5Y*
22.26%
10Y*
17.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTAI vs. CBOE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTAI
Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC
27.48%38.01%214.72%181.65%-36.67%29.27%33.15%48.05%-22.18%62.27%
CBOE
Cboe Global Markets, Inc.
14.48%29.96%10.74%44.37%-2.16%42.23%-21.17%24.16%-20.60%70.49%

Correlation

The correlation between FTAI and CBOE is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2015

0.05

The correlation between FTAI and CBOE shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (3 years) to 0.06 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FTAI:

$26.07B

CBOE:

$30.03B

EPS

FTAI:

$5.13

CBOE:

$11.77

PE Ratio

FTAI:

48.72

CBOE:

24.31

PEG Ratio

FTAI:

0.03

CBOE:

0.45

PS Ratio

FTAI:

9.15

CBOE:

6.27

PB Ratio

FTAI:

60.40

CBOE:

5.59

Total Revenue (TTM)

FTAI:

$2.84B

CBOE:

$4.79B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FTAI:

$922.62M

CBOE:

$2.50B

EBITDA (TTM)

FTAI:

$992.07M

CBOE:

$1.87B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTAI vs. CBOE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTAI
FTAI Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FTAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTAI Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FTAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTAI Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

CBOE
CBOE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
CBOE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBOE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBOE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
CBOE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBOE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTAI vs. CBOE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC (FTAI) and Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTAICBOEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.21

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

1.19

+2.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.43

6.39

+2.04

FTAI vs. CBOE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTAI Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is higher than the CBOE Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTAI and CBOE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTAICBOEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

1.09

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

0.97

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

0.71

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.66

+0.05

Drawdowns

FTAI vs. CBOE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTAI drawdown since its inception was -72.79%, which is greater than CBOE's maximum drawdown of -43.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTAI and CBOE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTAICBOEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.79%

-43.23%

-29.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.15%

-24.69%

-6.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.11%

-24.69%

-27.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.08%

-24.69%

-29.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.79%

-43.23%

-29.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.06%

-21.84%

+2.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.36%

-11.39%

-5.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.52%

4.58%

+7.94%

Volatility

FTAI vs. CBOE - Volatility Comparison

Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC (FTAI) has a higher volatility of 23.39% compared to Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE) at 15.71%. This indicates that FTAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBOE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTAICBOEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.39%

15.71%

+7.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.47%

23.68%

+22.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.09%

26.97%

+36.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.22%

23.16%

+33.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.03%

25.31%

+25.72%

Dividends

FTAI vs. CBOE - Dividend Comparison

FTAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than CBOE's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBOE
Cboe Global Markets, Inc.
1.01%1.08%1.21%1.18%1.56%1.38%1.68%1.12%1.19%0.83%1.30%1.36%
FTAI
Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC
0.60%0.64%0.83%2.59%7.54%4.56%5.63%6.76%9.21%6.62%9.92%4.26%

Financials

FTAI vs. CBOE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC and Cboe Global Markets, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
830.70M
1.27B
(FTAI) Total Revenue
(CBOE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FTAI vs. CBOE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC and Cboe Global Markets, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
36.9%
52.6%
Portfolio components
FTAI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC reported a gross profit of 306.43M and revenue of 830.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.

CBOE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cboe Global Markets, Inc. reported a gross profit of 669.90M and revenue of 1.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.6%.

FTAI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC reported an operating income of 241.44M and revenue of 830.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.1%.

CBOE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cboe Global Markets, Inc. reported an operating income of 505.60M and revenue of 1.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 39.7%.

FTAI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC reported a net income of 134.19M and revenue of 830.70M, resulting in a net margin of 16.2%.

CBOE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cboe Global Markets, Inc. reported a net income of 385.70M and revenue of 1.27B, resulting in a net margin of 30.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FTAI and CBOE have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTAI has higher volatility (23.39%) compared to CBOE (15.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTAI dropped -72.79% vs CBOE's -43.23%.

FTAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTAI and CBOE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer