FTABX vs. FHKCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund (FTABX) and Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX).
FTABX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 10, 2001. FHKCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 1, 1995.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FTABX or FHKCX.
Correlation
The correlation between FTABX and FHKCX is -0.13. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Performance
FTABX vs. FHKCX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FTABX:
0.15
FHKCX:
0.71
FTABX:
0.23
FHKCX:
1.16
FTABX:
1.04
FHKCX:
1.14
FTABX:
0.13
FHKCX:
0.37
FTABX:
0.53
FHKCX:
2.19
FTABX:
1.52%
FHKCX:
8.27%
FTABX:
5.37%
FHKCX:
25.60%
FTABX:
-15.78%
FHKCX:
-62.36%
FTABX:
-4.77%
FHKCX:
-39.83%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTABX achieves a -2.45% return, which is significantly lower than FHKCX's -0.46% return. Over the past 10 years, FTABX has underperformed FHKCX with an annualized return of 1.98%, while FHKCX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.69% annualized return.
FTABX
-2.45%
-2.22%
-1.71%
0.52%
1.36%
1.98%
FHKCX
-0.46%
-7.39%
-5.63%
15.30%
1.45%
2.69%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FTABX vs. FHKCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTABX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FHKCX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FTABX vs. FHKCX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FTABX
FHKCX
FTABX vs. FHKCX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund (FTABX) and Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FTABX vs. FHKCX - Dividend Comparison
FTABX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, more than FHKCX's 1.40% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTABX Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund | 3.14% | 3.02% | 2.90% | 2.85% | 2.40% | 2.60% | 2.84% | 3.02% | 3.07% | 3.37% | 3.58% | 3.62% |
FHKCX Fidelity China Region Fund | 1.40% | 1.39% | 1.92% | 1.05% | 0.13% | 0.97% | 0.66% | 0.83% | 0.39% | 1.14% | 16.83% | 15.96% |
Drawdowns
FTABX vs. FHKCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTABX drawdown since its inception was -15.78%, smaller than the maximum FHKCX drawdown of -62.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTABX and FHKCX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FTABX vs. FHKCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund (FTABX) is 4.10%, while Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX) has a volatility of 13.15%. This indicates that FTABX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHKCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.