FTABX vs. FHKCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund (FTABX) and Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX).
FTABX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 10, 2001. FHKCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 1, 1995.
Performance
FTABX vs. FHKCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FTABX vs. FHKCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTABX Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund | -0.50% | 5.60% | 1.54% | 7.51% | -10.74% | 2.20% | 4.80% | 8.58% | 0.67% | 6.45% |
FHKCX Fidelity China Region Fund | 8.35% | 42.56% | 23.15% | -0.29% | -23.87% | -13.69% | 47.85% | 35.12% | -17.43% | 51.94% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTABX achieves a -0.50% return, which is significantly lower than FHKCX's 8.35% return. Over the past 10 years, FTABX has underperformed FHKCX with an annualized return of 2.32%, while FHKCX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.46% annualized return.
FTABX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -2.32%
- YTD
- -0.50%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- 4.23%
- 3Y*
- 3.59%
- 5Y*
- 0.97%
- 10Y*
- 2.32%
FHKCX
- 1D
- 2.70%
- 1M
- -6.14%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 7.83%
- 1Y
- 46.41%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 2.94%
- 10Y*
- 12.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FTABX vs. FHKCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTABX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FHKCX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FTABX vs. FHKCX — Risk / Return Rank
FTABX
FHKCX
FTABX vs. FHKCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund (FTABX) and Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTABX | FHKCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.97 | 2.06 | -1.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.31 | 2.62 | -1.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.38 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | 2.94 | -1.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.00 | 11.28 | -7.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTABX | FHKCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 2.06 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.12 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.57 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.04 | 0.40 | +0.64 |
Correlation
The correlation between FTABX and FHKCX is -0.09. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
FTABX vs. FHKCX - Dividend Comparison
FTABX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, more than FHKCX's 1.62% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTABX Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund | 3.20% | 4.18% | 2.81% | 2.90% | 2.16% | 2.27% | 2.64% | 2.94% | 3.01% | 3.49% | 4.22% | 3.29% |
FHKCX Fidelity China Region Fund | 1.62% | 1.75% | 1.39% | 1.92% | 1.05% | 10.77% | 4.85% | 0.66% | 0.83% | 0.39% | 1.35% | 15.47% |
Drawdowns
FTABX vs. FHKCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTABX drawdown since its inception was -16.14%, smaller than the maximum FHKCX drawdown of -61.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTABX and FHKCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTABX | FHKCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.14% | -61.96% | +45.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.74% | -15.90% | +11.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.14% | -53.82% | +37.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.14% | -58.41% | +42.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.66% | -8.40% | +5.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.13% | -20.37% | +18.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.37% | 4.15% | -2.78% |
Volatility
FTABX vs. FHKCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund (FTABX) is 1.15%, while Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX) has a volatility of 9.78%. This indicates that FTABX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHKCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FTABX | FHKCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.15% | 9.78% | -8.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.79% | 16.55% | -14.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.84% | 23.25% | -18.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.12% | 24.00% | -19.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.27% | 22.11% | -17.84% |