FSUTX vs. HTGC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FSUTX (Fidelity Select Utilities Portfolio) is Utilities Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while HTGC (Hercules Capital, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, FSUTX returned 11.46%/yr vs 13.30%/yr for HTGC. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FSUTX vs. HTGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Utilities Portfolio (FSUTX) and Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSUTX achieves a 4.36% return, which is significantly higher than HTGC's -14.37% return. Over the past 10 years, FSUTX has underperformed HTGC with an annualized return of 11.46%, while HTGC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.30% annualized return.

FSUTX

• 1D: 2.12%
• 1M: -5.86%
• YTD: 4.36%
• 6M: 2.10%
• 1Y: 13.09%
• 3Y*: 17.55%
• 5Y*: 12.96%
• 10Y*: 11.46%

HTGC

• 1D: -1.93%
• 1M: -5.03%
• YTD: -14.37%
• 6M: -14.09%
• 1Y: -4.30%
• 3Y*: 12.45%
• 5Y*: 9.03%
• 10Y*: 13.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSUTX vs. HTGC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSUTX Fidelity Select Utilities Portfolio	4.36%	16.19%	28.76%	-1.12%	5.20%	17.64%	0.75%	22.68%	8.41%	17.94%
HTGC Hercules Capital, Inc.	-14.37%	3.54%	33.33%	42.91%	-10.42%	26.50%	14.49%	39.86%	-6.86%	1.86%

Correlation

The correlation between FSUTX and HTGC is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2005	0.32

The correlation between FSUTX and HTGC shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FSUTX vs. HTGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSUTX

FSUTX Risk / Return Rank: 12
FSUTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
FSUTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
FSUTX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
FSUTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
FSUTX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

HTGC

HTGC Risk / Return Rank: 31
HTGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
HTGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
HTGC Omega Ratio Rank: 27
HTGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
HTGC Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSUTX vs. HTGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Utilities Portfolio (FSUTX) and Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSUTX	HTGC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.84	-0.19	+1.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.22	-0.10	+1.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	0.99	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.48	-0.17	+1.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.46	-0.40	+3.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSUTX vs. HTGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSUTX Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is higher than the HTGC Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSUTX and HTGC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSUTX	HTGC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84	-0.19	+1.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75	0.35	+0.40
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59	0.48	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.35	+0.32

Drawdowns

FSUTX vs. HTGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSUTX drawdown since its inception was -66.73%, roughly equal to the maximum HTGC drawdown of -68.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSUTX and HTGC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSUTX	HTGC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.73%	-68.21%	+1.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.21%	-24.74%	+15.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.20%	-27.97%	+12.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.15%	-36.11%	+15.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.61%	-57.54%	+19.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.72%	-19.03%	+12.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.26%	-10.86%	-0.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.93%	10.72%	-6.79%

Volatility

FSUTX vs. HTGC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Utilities Portfolio (FSUTX) has a higher volatility of 6.02% compared to Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC) at 5.23%. This indicates that FSUTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSUTX	HTGC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.02%	5.23%	+0.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.25%	20.00%	-6.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.29%	23.14%	-6.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.40%	25.72%	-8.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.39%	27.84%	-8.45%

Dividends

FSUTX vs. HTGC - Dividend Comparison

FSUTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, less than HTGC's 11.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSUTX Fidelity Select Utilities Portfolio	5.03%	6.61%	6.50%	3.52%	4.67%	2.68%	4.86%	2.29%	8.37%	5.61%	2.51%	4.47%
HTGC Hercules Capital, Inc.	11.89%	9.99%	9.56%	11.40%	13.77%	9.76%	9.02%	9.49%	11.40%	9.45%	8.79%	10.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSUTX and HTGC in my portfolio?

FSUTX and HTGC have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSUTX or HTGC?

FSUTX has higher volatility (6.02%) compared to HTGC (5.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSUTX dropped -66.73% vs HTGC's -68.21%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSUTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.