PortfoliosLab logo
FSTKX vs. FBGRX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FSTKX and FBGRX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

FSTKX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value Fund (FSTKX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FSTKX:

0.98

FBGRX:

0.42

Sortino Ratio

FSTKX:

1.36

FBGRX:

0.68

Omega Ratio

FSTKX:

1.20

FBGRX:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

FSTKX:

1.02

FBGRX:

0.37

Martin Ratio

FSTKX:

3.94

FBGRX:

1.13

Ulcer Index

FSTKX:

3.91%

FBGRX:

8.83%

Daily Std Dev

FSTKX:

16.82%

FBGRX:

28.42%

Max Drawdown

FSTKX:

-53.21%

FBGRX:

-58.02%

Current Drawdown

FSTKX:

-1.35%

FBGRX:

-8.03%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSTKX achieves a 5.53% return, which is significantly higher than FBGRX's -3.61% return. Over the past 10 years, FSTKX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 9.94%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.86% annualized return.


FSTKX

YTD

5.53%

1M

5.52%

6M

-1.24%

1Y

16.11%

3Y*

13.09%

5Y*

16.99%

10Y*

9.94%

FBGRX

YTD

-3.61%

1M

8.83%

6M

-2.33%

1Y

12.20%

3Y*

21.83%

5Y*

18.42%

10Y*

16.86%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund

FSTKX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSTKX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FSTKX vs. FBGRX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSTKX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FSTKX is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FSTKX is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FSTKX is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FSTKX is 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FSTKX is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FSTKX is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

FBGRX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FBGRX is 3131
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FSTKX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value Fund (FSTKX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FSTKX Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is higher than the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSTKX and FBGRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

FSTKX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

FSTKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.36%, more than FBGRX's 6.17% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FSTKX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value Fund
14.36%15.06%1.86%14.61%18.45%1.30%2.63%10.03%10.01%5.12%9.25%8.25%
FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
6.17%5.95%0.93%0.57%8.73%6.40%3.70%6.32%4.28%4.05%5.30%5.96%

Drawdowns

FSTKX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSTKX drawdown since its inception was -53.21%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTKX and FBGRX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

FSTKX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value Fund (FSTKX) is 4.49%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 6.52%. This indicates that FSTKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...