FSTGX vs. BSV
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Intermediate Government Income Fund (FSTGX) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV).
FSTGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 2, 1988. BSV is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. 1–5 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2007.
Performance
FSTGX vs. BSV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSTGX vs. BSV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSTGX Fidelity Intermediate Government Income Fund | -0.22% | 6.00% | 2.24% | 3.88% | -8.76% | -2.28% | 5.46% | 4.84% | 1.20% | 0.98% |
BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares | 0.13% | 6.00% | 3.78% | 4.90% | -5.49% | -1.09% | 4.70% | 4.98% | 1.34% | 1.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSTGX achieves a -0.22% return, which is significantly lower than BSV's 0.13% return. Over the past 10 years, FSTGX has underperformed BSV with an annualized return of 1.05%, while BSV has yielded a comparatively higher 1.97% annualized return.
FSTGX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -1.40%
- YTD
- -0.22%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- 1Y
- 3.29%
- 3Y*
- 3.16%
- 5Y*
- 0.44%
- 10Y*
- 1.05%
BSV
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- YTD
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 1.33%
- 1Y
- 4.13%
- 3Y*
- 4.27%
- 5Y*
- 1.68%
- 10Y*
- 1.97%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSTGX vs. BSV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSTGX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than BSV's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSTGX vs. BSV — Risk / Return Rank
FSTGX
BSV
FSTGX vs. BSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Intermediate Government Income Fund (FSTGX) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSTGX | BSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.23 | 2.08 | -0.85 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.89 | 3.31 | -1.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.41 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | 3.25 | -0.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.20 | 12.45 | -5.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSTGX | BSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | 2.08 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.62 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.83 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.21 | 0.86 | +0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSTGX and BSV is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FSTGX vs. BSV - Dividend Comparison
FSTGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, less than BSV's 3.90% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSTGX Fidelity Intermediate Government Income Fund | 2.84% | 3.04% | 2.94% | 2.12% | 0.99% | 0.77% | 2.65% | 1.85% | 1.84% | 1.47% | 1.52% | 1.69% |
BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares | 3.90% | 3.83% | 3.38% | 2.46% | 1.50% | 1.45% | 1.79% | 2.29% | 1.99% | 1.65% | 1.48% | 1.40% |
Drawdowns
FSTGX vs. BSV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSTGX drawdown since its inception was -13.66%, which is greater than BSV's maximum drawdown of -8.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTGX and BSV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSTGX | BSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.66% | -8.54% | -5.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.80% | -1.29% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.54% | -8.54% | -4.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.66% | -8.54% | -5.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.40% | -0.78% | -0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.57% | -0.98% | -0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.57% | 0.34% | +0.23% |
Volatility
FSTGX vs. BSV - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Intermediate Government Income Fund (FSTGX) has a higher volatility of 0.98% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV) at 0.77%. This indicates that FSTGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSTGX | BSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.98% | 0.77% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.74% | 1.19% | +0.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.98% | 2.00% | +0.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.08% | 2.71% | +1.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.38% | 2.37% | +1.01% |