FSTA vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
FSTA and SCHG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FSTA is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009. Both FSTA and SCHG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FSTA or SCHG.
Key characteristics
| FSTA | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 4.95% | 7.08% |
| 1Y Return | 2.37% | 36.41% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 5.72% | 8.86% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 8.93% | 17.10% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 8.49% | 15.48% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.19 | 2.22 |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.37% | 15.82% |
| Max Drawdown | -25.13% | -34.59% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.14% | -4.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSTA and SCHG is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
FSTA vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FSTA achieves a 4.95% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 7.08% return. Over the past 10 years, FSTA has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 8.49%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 15.48% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSTA vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSTA has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FSTA vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FSTA vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
FSTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, more than SCHG's 0.45% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF | 2.58% | 2.66% | 2.26% | 2.15% | 2.47% | 2.46% | 3.01% | 2.42% | 2.53% | 2.86% | 2.24% | 0.45% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.45% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 0.82% | 1.22% | 1.09% | 1.07% |
Drawdowns
FSTA vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSTA drawdown since its inception was -25.13%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTA and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FSTA vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) is 2.76%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.59%. This indicates that FSTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.