PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSTA vs. PSCC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSTA vs. PSCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FSTA having a 5.16% return and PSCC slightly higher at 5.29%. Over the past 10 years, FSTA has outperformed PSCC with an annualized return of 7.51%, while PSCC has yielded a comparatively lower 6.18% annualized return.


FSTA

1D
-0.27%
1M
-4.65%
YTD
5.16%
6M
3.92%
1Y
0.25%
3Y*
7.13%
5Y*
5.90%
10Y*
7.51%

PSCC

1D
-0.38%
1M
-4.02%
YTD
5.29%
6M
4.75%
1Y
-5.46%
3Y*
-1.81%
5Y*
-0.54%
10Y*
6.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSTA vs. PSCC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSTA
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF
5.16%1.82%13.31%2.29%-1.72%17.44%10.96%26.84%-8.49%12.71%
PSCC
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF
5.29%-16.47%0.98%14.83%-6.66%28.82%11.17%17.39%-6.72%9.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FSTA and PSCC is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2013

0.60

The correlation between FSTA and PSCC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

FSTA vs. PSCC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FSTA
PSCC

Consumer Defensive

97.3%
90.4%

Consumer Cyclical

1.8%
2.9%

Industrials

0.3%
3.0%

Basic Materials

0.3%
3.8%

Healthcare

0.0%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Defensive

FSTA
97.3%
PSCC
90.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FSTA
1.8%
PSCC
2.9%

Industrials

FSTA
0.3%
PSCC
3.0%

Basic Materials

FSTA
0.3%
PSCC
3.8%

Healthcare

FSTA
0.0%
PSCC

-

Communication Services

FSTA

-

PSCC

-

Energy

FSTA

-

PSCC

-

Financial Services

FSTA

-

PSCC

-

Real Estate

FSTA

-

PSCC

-

Technology

FSTA

-

PSCC

-

Utilities

FSTA

-

PSCC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSTA vs. PSCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSTA
FSTA Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
FSTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTA Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTA Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

PSCC
PSCC Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
PSCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCC Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCC Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSTA vs. PSCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSTAPSCCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.02

-0.33

+0.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.12

-0.37

+0.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.96

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.04

-0.39

+0.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.09

-0.69

+0.77

FSTA vs. PSCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSTA Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is higher than the PSCC Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSTA and PSCC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSTAPSCCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

-0.33

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

-0.03

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.32

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.55

+0.05

Drawdowns

FSTA vs. PSCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSTA drawdown since its inception was -25.13%, smaller than the maximum PSCC drawdown of -33.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTA and PSCC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSTAPSCCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.13%

-33.61%

+8.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.29%

-15.17%

+5.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.76%

-23.36%

+11.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.58%

-23.36%

+6.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.13%

-33.61%

+8.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.10%

-17.79%

+8.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.55%

-5.97%

+2.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.52%

8.67%

-4.15%

Volatility

FSTA vs. PSCC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) is 4.05%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that FSTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSTAPSCCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

4.90%

-0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.75%

10.76%

-1.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.37%

16.48%

-4.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.11%

18.24%

-5.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.56%

19.29%

-4.73%

FSTA vs. PSCC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSTA has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCC's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSTA vs. PSCC - Dividend Comparison

FSTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, more than PSCC's 2.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSTA
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF
2.26%2.34%2.25%2.66%2.26%2.15%2.47%2.46%3.01%2.42%2.53%2.86%
PSCC
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF
2.11%2.35%1.88%1.49%1.29%1.21%1.59%1.77%0.94%1.25%1.48%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSTA and PSCC have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSCC has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to FSTA (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTA dropped -25.13% vs PSCC's -33.61%.

On 10-year performance, FSTA leads with 7.51% vs 6.18% for PSCC. On fees, FSTA is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FSTA has been the lower-risk option at 4.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FSTA has performed better with a 7.51% return vs 6.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FSTA is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCC.

FSTA has the higher dividend yield at 2.26%, compared with 2.11% for PSCC.

FSTA tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index, while PSCC tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FSTA and 0.29% for PSCC.

FSTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.02 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSTA and PSCC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer