FSTA vs. PSCC
FSTA (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF) and PSCC (Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - FSTA tracks the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index while PSCC tracks the S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FSTA returned 7.91%/yr vs 6.95%/yr for PSCC. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSTA charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PSCC.
Performance
FSTA vs. PSCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSTA achieves a 8.86% return, which is significantly lower than PSCC's 13.60% return. Over the past 10 years, FSTA has outperformed PSCC with an annualized return of 7.91%, while PSCC has yielded a comparatively lower 6.95% annualized return.
FSTA
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- -0.47%
- YTD
- 8.86%
- 6M
- 8.88%
- 1Y
- 5.28%
- 3Y*
- 8.04%
- 5Y*
- 7.17%
- 10Y*
- 7.91%
PSCC
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- 6.59%
- YTD
- 13.60%
- 6M
- 11.94%
- 1Y
- 5.58%
- 3Y*
- 1.06%
- 5Y*
- 1.40%
- 10Y*
- 6.95%
FSTA vs. PSCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF | 8.86% | 1.82% | 13.31% | 2.29% | -1.72% | 17.44% | 10.96% | 26.84% | -8.49% | 12.71% |
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 13.60% | -16.47% | 0.98% | 14.83% | -6.66% | 28.82% | 11.17% | 17.39% | -6.72% | 9.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSTA and PSCC is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013 | 0.60 |
The correlation between FSTA and PSCC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
FSTA vs. PSCC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FSTA
PSCC
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
FSTA
PSCC
Consumer Cyclical
FSTA
PSCC
Industrials
FSTA
PSCC
Basic Materials
FSTA
PSCC
Healthcare
FSTA
PSCC
-
Communication Services
FSTA
-
PSCC
-
Energy
FSTA
-
PSCC
-
Financial Services
FSTA
-
PSCC
Real Estate
FSTA
-
PSCC
-
Technology
FSTA
-
PSCC
-
Utilities
FSTA
-
PSCC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSTA vs. PSCC — Risk / Return Rank
FSTA
PSCC
FSTA vs. PSCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSTA | PSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.07 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.57 | 0.37 | +0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.12 | 0.64 | +0.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSTA vs. PSCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSTA drawdown since its inception was -25.13%, smaller than the maximum PSCC drawdown of -33.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTA and PSCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSTA | PSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.13% | -33.61% | +8.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.29% | -15.17% | +5.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.76% | -23.36% | +11.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.58% | -23.36% | +6.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.13% | -33.61% | +8.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.90% | -11.31% | +5.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.56% | -5.99% | +2.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.71% | 8.69% | -3.98% |
Volatility
FSTA vs. PSCC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) is 4.99%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that FSTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSTA | PSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.99% | 5.66% | -0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.34% | 11.53% | -1.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.79% | 16.90% | -4.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.17% | 18.30% | -5.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.59% | 19.33% | -4.74% |
FSTA vs. PSCC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSTA has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCC's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSTA vs. PSCC - Dividend Comparison
FSTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, more than PSCC's 1.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF | 2.20% | 2.34% | 2.25% | 2.66% | 2.26% | 2.15% | 2.47% | 2.46% | 3.01% | 2.42% | 2.53% | 2.86% |
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 1.72% | 2.35% | 1.88% | 1.49% | 1.29% | 1.21% | 1.59% | 1.77% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSTA and PSCC have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSCC has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to FSTA (4.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTA dropped -25.13% vs PSCC's -33.61%.
On 10-year performance, FSTA leads with 7.91% vs 6.95% for PSCC. On fees, FSTA is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FSTA has been the lower-risk option at 4.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FSTA has performed better with a 7.91% return vs 6.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FSTA is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCC.
FSTA has the higher dividend yield at 2.20%, compared with 1.72% for PSCC.
FSTA tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index, while PSCC tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FSTA and 0.29% for PSCC.
FSTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.42 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSTA and PSCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer