PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FSSMX vs. VUG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FSSMX and VUG is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.8

Performance

FSSMX vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund (FSSMX) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%600.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
256.83%
503.29%
FSSMX
VUG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FSSMX:

0.02

VUG:

0.29

Sortino Ratio

FSSMX:

0.18

VUG:

0.57

Omega Ratio

FSSMX:

1.02

VUG:

1.08

Calmar Ratio

FSSMX:

0.02

VUG:

0.31

Martin Ratio

FSSMX:

0.06

VUG:

1.14

Ulcer Index

FSSMX:

6.37%

VUG:

6.25%

Daily Std Dev

FSSMX:

21.95%

VUG:

24.69%

Max Drawdown

FSSMX:

-43.37%

VUG:

-50.68%

Current Drawdown

FSSMX:

-17.22%

VUG:

-17.66%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSSMX achieves a -10.06% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's -14.22% return. Over the past 10 years, FSSMX has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 7.56%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 13.38% annualized return.


FSSMX

YTD

-10.06%

1M

-6.61%

6M

-10.13%

1Y

-0.78%

5Y*

14.56%

10Y*

7.56%

VUG

YTD

-14.22%

1M

-7.43%

6M

-10.47%

1Y

8.53%

5Y*

16.05%

10Y*

13.38%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FSSMX vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSSMX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.04% expense ratio.


FSSMX
Fidelity Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund
Expense ratio chart for FSSMX: current value is 0.79%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
FSSMX: 0.79%
Expense ratio chart for VUG: current value is 0.04%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
VUG: 0.04%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FSSMX vs. VUG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSSMX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FSSMX is 3535
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FSSMX is 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FSSMX is 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FSSMX is 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FSSMX is 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FSSMX is 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VUG is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VUG is 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VUG is 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VUG is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VUG is 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VUG is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FSSMX vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund (FSSMX) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FSSMX, currently valued at 0.02, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.00
FSSMX: 0.02
VUG: 0.29
The chart of Sortino ratio for FSSMX, currently valued at 0.18, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
FSSMX: 0.18
VUG: 0.57
The chart of Omega ratio for FSSMX, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.00
FSSMX: 1.02
VUG: 1.08
The chart of Calmar ratio for FSSMX, currently valued at 0.02, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.00
FSSMX: 0.02
VUG: 0.31
The chart of Martin ratio for FSSMX, currently valued at 0.06, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0040.0050.00
FSSMX: 0.06
VUG: 1.14

The current FSSMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is lower than the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSSMX and VUG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.02
0.29
FSSMX
VUG

Dividends

FSSMX vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

FSSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, more than VUG's 0.55% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FSSMX
Fidelity Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund
3.45%3.10%0.78%9.73%12.87%2.31%4.03%21.01%4.62%0.92%2.06%0.30%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.55%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%1.21%

Drawdowns

FSSMX vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSSMX drawdown since its inception was -43.37%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSSMX and VUG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-17.22%
-17.66%
FSSMX
VUG

Volatility

FSSMX vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund (FSSMX) is 14.83%, while Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a volatility of 16.50%. This indicates that FSSMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
14.83%
16.50%
FSSMX
VUG
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab