PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSS vs. TTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FSS vs. TTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federal Signal Corporation (FSS) and TETRA Technologies, Inc. (TTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSS achieves a 7.98% return, which is significantly higher than TTI's -2.03% return. Over the past 10 years, FSS has outperformed TTI with an annualized return of 25.16%, while TTI has yielded a comparatively lower 4.21% annualized return.


FSS

1D
1.48%
1M
7.18%
6M
0.27%
YTD
7.98%
1Y
6.73%
3Y*
23.11%
5Y*
25.38%
10Y*
25.16%

TTI

1D
-2.86%
1M
-11.73%
6M
-11.82%
YTD
-2.03%
1Y
156.42%
3Y*
33.37%
5Y*
20.59%
10Y*
4.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSS vs. TTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSS
Federal Signal Corporation
7.98%18.21%21.05%66.26%8.22%31.80%3.99%63.92%0.39%30.79%
TTI
TETRA Technologies, Inc.
-2.03%161.73%-20.80%30.64%21.83%229.66%-56.05%16.67%-60.66%-12.29%

Correlation

The correlation between FSS and TTI is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 1990

0.28

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FSS:

$7.13B

TTI:

$1.34B

EPS

FSS:

$4.40

TTI:

$0.05

PE Ratio

FSS:

26.55

TTI:

170.78

PEG Ratio

FSS:

1.04

TTI:

0.20

PS Ratio

FSS:

3.07

TTI:

1.97

PB Ratio

FSS:

5.01

TTI:

4.39

Total Revenue (TTM)

FSS:

$2.34B

TTI:

$630.05M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FSS:

$670.20M

TTI:

$154.82M

EBITDA (TTM)

FSS:

$435.10M

TTI:

$85.97M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSS vs. TTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSS
FSS Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
FSS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSS Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
FSS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSS Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

TTI
TTI Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
TTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTI Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
TTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTI Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSS vs. TTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federal Signal Corporation (FSS) and TETRA Technologies, Inc. (TTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSSTTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.39

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

4.18

-3.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.61

10.05

-9.44

FSS vs. TTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSS Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the TTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSS and TTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSS vs. TTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSS drawdown since its inception was -83.43%, smaller than the maximum TTI drawdown of -99.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSS and TTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSSTTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.43%

-99.27%

+15.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.04%

-37.66%

+18.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.54%

-67.43%

+35.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.96%

-67.43%

+34.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.96%

-96.60%

+63.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.64%

-69.68%

+57.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.54%

-55.76%

+33.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.07%

15.65%

-4.58%

Volatility

FSS vs. TTI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federal Signal Corporation (FSS) is 12.27%, while TETRA Technologies, Inc. (TTI) has a volatility of 17.20%. This indicates that FSS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSSTTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.27%

17.20%

-4.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.66%

43.27%

-17.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.84%

57.48%

-20.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.05%

61.34%

-30.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.77%

75.40%

-43.63%

Dividends

FSS vs. TTI - Dividend Comparison

FSS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, while TTI has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSS
Federal Signal Corporation
0.50%0.52%0.52%0.51%0.77%0.83%0.96%0.99%1.56%1.39%1.79%1.58%
TTI
TETRA Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.34%0.00%0.00%

Financials

FSS vs. TTI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Federal Signal Corporation and TETRA Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
625.60M
156.25M
(FSS) Total Revenue
(TTI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FSS vs. TTI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Federal Signal Corporation and TETRA Technologies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
28.7%
24.5%
Portfolio components
FSS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Federal Signal Corporation reported a gross profit of 179.40M and revenue of 625.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.7%.

TTI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, TETRA Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 38.23M and revenue of 156.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.5%.

FSS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Federal Signal Corporation reported an operating income of 99.70M and revenue of 625.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.9%.

TTI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, TETRA Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 12.82M and revenue of 156.25M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.2%.

FSS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Federal Signal Corporation reported a net income of 70.40M and revenue of 625.60M, resulting in a net margin of 11.3%.

TTI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, TETRA Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 8.32M and revenue of 156.25M, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FSS and TTI have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TTI has higher volatility (17.20%) compared to FSS (12.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSS dropped -83.43% vs TTI's -99.27%.

TTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSS and TTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer