PortfoliosLab logo
FSS vs. MMC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FSS and MMC is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

FSS vs. MMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federal Signal Corporation (FSS) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FSS:

0.09

MMC:

0.71

Sortino Ratio

FSS:

0.44

MMC:

1.05

Omega Ratio

FSS:

1.06

MMC:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

FSS:

0.15

MMC:

0.99

Martin Ratio

FSS:

0.39

MMC:

2.90

Ulcer Index

FSS:

12.52%

MMC:

4.47%

Daily Std Dev

FSS:

35.52%

MMC:

17.44%

Max Drawdown

FSS:

-83.42%

MMC:

-67.46%

Current Drawdown

FSS:

-11.44%

MMC:

-7.13%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FSS:

$5.46B

MMC:

$111.78B

EPS

FSS:

$3.41

MMC:

$8.16

PE Ratio

FSS:

26.26

MMC:

27.80

PEG Ratio

FSS:

1.67

MMC:

2.45

PS Ratio

FSS:

2.87

MMC:

4.46

PB Ratio

FSS:

4.54

MMC:

7.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

FSS:

$1.90B

MMC:

$25.05B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FSS:

$540.20M

MMC:

$10.67B

EBITDA (TTM)

FSS:

$339.50M

MMC:

$7.08B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSS achieves a -2.88% return, which is significantly lower than MMC's 7.56% return. Over the past 10 years, FSS has outperformed MMC with an annualized return of 20.62%, while MMC has yielded a comparatively lower 16.62% annualized return.


FSS

YTD

-2.88%

1M

17.44%

6M

-0.56%

1Y

2.70%

5Y*

28.69%

10Y*

20.62%

MMC

YTD

7.56%

1M

-2.78%

6M

1.38%

1Y

11.98%

5Y*

18.62%

10Y*

16.62%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FSS vs. MMC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FSS is 5252
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FSS is 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FSS is 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FSS is 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FSS is 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FSS is 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

MMC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MMC is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MMC is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MMC is 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MMC is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MMC is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MMC is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FSS vs. MMC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federal Signal Corporation (FSS) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FSS Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the MMC Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSS and MMC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

FSS vs. MMC - Dividend Comparison

FSS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than MMC's 1.44% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FSS
Federal Signal Corporation
0.56%0.52%0.51%0.77%0.83%0.96%0.99%1.56%1.39%1.79%1.58%0.58%
MMC
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
1.44%1.44%1.37%1.36%1.15%1.57%1.56%1.98%1.76%1.92%2.13%1.85%

Drawdowns

FSS vs. MMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSS drawdown since its inception was -83.42%, which is greater than MMC's maximum drawdown of -67.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSS and MMC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FSS vs. MMC - Volatility Comparison

Federal Signal Corporation (FSS) has a higher volatility of 10.73% compared to Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC) at 8.49%. This indicates that FSS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

FSS vs. MMC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Federal Signal Corporation and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20212022202320242025
463.80M
7.06B
(FSS) Total Revenue
(MMC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FSS vs. MMC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Federal Signal Corporation and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%20212022202320242025
28.2%
45.5%
(FSS) Gross Margin
(MMC) Gross Margin
FSS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Federal Signal Corporation reported a gross profit of 130.80M and revenue of 463.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.2%.

MMC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.21B and revenue of 7.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.5%.

FSS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Federal Signal Corporation reported an operating income of 65.70M and revenue of 463.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.2%.

MMC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.01B and revenue of 7.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.4%.

FSS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Federal Signal Corporation reported a net income of 46.30M and revenue of 463.80M, resulting in a net margin of 10.0%.

MMC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. reported a net income of 1.38B and revenue of 7.06B, resulting in a net margin of 19.6%.