FSS vs. MMC
Compare and contrast key facts about Federal Signal Corporation (FSS) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FSS or MMC.
Correlation
The correlation between FSS and MMC is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FSS vs. MMC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FSS:
0.67
MMC:
1.16
FSS:
1.10
MMC:
1.63
FSS:
1.14
MMC:
1.21
FSS:
1.06
MMC:
1.52
FSS:
2.76
MMC:
4.27
FSS:
7.02%
MMC:
3.79%
FSS:
29.06%
MMC:
13.93%
FSS:
-83.42%
MMC:
-67.46%
FSS:
-7.51%
MMC:
-1.02%
Fundamentals
FSS:
$5.73B
MMC:
$112.97B
FSS:
$3.45
MMC:
$8.19
FSS:
27.16
MMC:
28.08
FSS:
2.71
MMC:
2.44
FSS:
$1.39B
MMC:
$24.46B
FSS:
$389.20M
MMC:
$14.09B
FSS:
$260.60M
MMC:
$6.99B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSS achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than MMC's 8.69% return. Over the past 10 years, FSS has outperformed MMC with an annualized return of 20.47%, while MMC has yielded a comparatively lower 16.93% annualized return.
FSS
1.43%
-5.56%
-0.13%
15.57%
24.18%
20.47%
MMC
8.69%
6.22%
3.76%
14.27%
16.38%
16.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FSS vs. MMC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FSS
MMC
FSS vs. MMC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federal Signal Corporation (FSS) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FSS vs. MMC - Dividend Comparison
FSS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than MMC's 1.37% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSS Federal Signal Corporation | 0.51% | 0.52% | 0.51% | 0.77% | 0.83% | 0.96% | 0.99% | 1.56% | 1.39% | 1.79% | 1.58% | 0.58% |
MMC Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. | 1.37% | 1.44% | 1.37% | 1.36% | 1.15% | 1.57% | 1.56% | 1.98% | 1.76% | 1.92% | 2.13% | 1.85% |
Drawdowns
FSS vs. MMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSS drawdown since its inception was -83.42%, which is greater than MMC's maximum drawdown of -67.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSS and MMC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FSS vs. MMC - Volatility Comparison
Federal Signal Corporation (FSS) has a higher volatility of 7.05% compared to Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC) at 4.44%. This indicates that FSS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
FSS vs. MMC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Federal Signal Corporation and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities