FSS vs. MMC
Compare and contrast key facts about Federal Signal Corporation (FSS) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FSS or MMC.
Correlation
The correlation between FSS and MMC is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FSS vs. MMC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FSS:
-0.49
MMC:
0.97
FSS:
-0.48
MMC:
1.31
FSS:
0.94
MMC:
1.18
FSS:
-0.55
MMC:
1.39
FSS:
-1.55
MMC:
3.91
FSS:
10.38%
MMC:
3.78%
FSS:
32.77%
MMC:
15.24%
FSS:
-83.42%
MMC:
-67.46%
FSS:
-29.43%
MMC:
-5.76%
Fundamentals
FSS:
$4.36B
MMC:
$113.47B
FSS:
$3.50
MMC:
$8.17
FSS:
20.39
MMC:
28.18
FSS:
1.38
MMC:
2.44
FSS:
$1.44B
MMC:
$17.99B
FSS:
$409.40M
MMC:
$11.09B
FSS:
$273.80M
MMC:
$4.78B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSS achieves a -22.61% return, which is significantly lower than MMC's 9.14% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSS having a 17.37% annualized return and MMC not far behind at 17.12%.
FSS
-22.61%
-11.61%
-21.06%
-15.93%
24.62%
17.37%
MMC
9.14%
-2.87%
4.35%
16.35%
25.59%
17.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FSS vs. MMC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FSS
MMC
FSS vs. MMC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federal Signal Corporation (FSS) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FSS vs. MMC - Dividend Comparison
FSS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than MMC's 1.42% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSS Federal Signal Corporation | 0.70% | 0.52% | 0.51% | 0.77% | 0.83% | 0.96% | 0.99% | 1.56% | 1.39% | 1.79% | 1.58% | 0.58% |
MMC Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. | 1.42% | 1.44% | 1.37% | 1.36% | 1.15% | 1.57% | 1.56% | 1.98% | 1.76% | 1.92% | 2.13% | 1.85% |
Drawdowns
FSS vs. MMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSS drawdown since its inception was -83.42%, which is greater than MMC's maximum drawdown of -67.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSS and MMC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FSS vs. MMC - Volatility Comparison
Federal Signal Corporation (FSS) has a higher volatility of 11.45% compared to Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC) at 7.06%. This indicates that FSS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
FSS vs. MMC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Federal Signal Corporation and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities