FSS vs. MMC
Compare and contrast key facts about Federal Signal Corporation (FSS) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FSS or MMC.
Correlation
The correlation between FSS and MMC is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FSS vs. MMC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FSS:
1.12
MMC:
0.87
FSS:
1.64
MMC:
1.21
FSS:
1.21
MMC:
1.16
FSS:
1.78
MMC:
1.15
FSS:
4.70
MMC:
3.39
FSS:
6.95%
MMC:
3.59%
FSS:
29.15%
MMC:
14.06%
FSS:
-83.42%
MMC:
-67.46%
FSS:
-1.88%
MMC:
-7.27%
Fundamentals
FSS:
$5.87B
MMC:
$104.79B
FSS:
$3.41
MMC:
$8.08
FSS:
28.16
MMC:
26.31
FSS:
2.71
MMC:
2.26
FSS:
$1.39B
MMC:
$18.39B
FSS:
$389.20M
MMC:
$8.03B
FSS:
$260.60M
MMC:
$5.55B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSS achieves a 5.90% return, which is significantly higher than MMC's 1.83% return. Over the past 10 years, FSS has outperformed MMC with an annualized return of 22.06%, while MMC has yielded a comparatively lower 16.37% annualized return.
FSS
5.90%
2.24%
5.16%
35.32%
24.05%
22.06%
MMC
1.83%
1.46%
0.22%
11.77%
15.41%
16.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FSS vs. MMC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FSS
MMC
FSS vs. MMC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federal Signal Corporation (FSS) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FSS vs. MMC - Dividend Comparison
FSS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than MMC's 1.41% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSS Federal Signal Corporation | 0.49% | 0.52% | 0.51% | 0.77% | 0.83% | 0.96% | 0.99% | 1.56% | 1.39% | 1.79% | 1.58% | 0.58% |
MMC Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. | 1.41% | 1.44% | 1.37% | 1.36% | 1.15% | 1.57% | 1.56% | 1.98% | 1.76% | 1.92% | 2.13% | 1.85% |
Drawdowns
FSS vs. MMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSS drawdown since its inception was -83.42%, which is greater than MMC's maximum drawdown of -67.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSS and MMC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FSS vs. MMC - Volatility Comparison
Federal Signal Corporation (FSS) has a higher volatility of 8.56% compared to Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC) at 3.90%. This indicates that FSS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
FSS vs. MMC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Federal Signal Corporation and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities