FSS vs. MMC
Compare and contrast key facts about Federal Signal Corporation (FSS) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FSS or MMC.
Correlation
The correlation between FSS and MMC is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
FSS vs. MMC - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
FSS:
0.09
MMC:
0.71
FSS:
0.44
MMC:
1.05
FSS:
1.06
MMC:
1.15
FSS:
0.15
MMC:
0.99
FSS:
0.39
MMC:
2.90
FSS:
12.52%
MMC:
4.47%
FSS:
35.52%
MMC:
17.44%
FSS:
-83.42%
MMC:
-67.46%
FSS:
-11.44%
MMC:
-7.13%
Fundamentals
FSS:
$5.46B
MMC:
$111.78B
FSS:
$3.41
MMC:
$8.16
FSS:
26.26
MMC:
27.80
FSS:
1.67
MMC:
2.45
FSS:
2.87
MMC:
4.46
FSS:
4.54
MMC:
7.95
FSS:
$1.90B
MMC:
$25.05B
FSS:
$540.20M
MMC:
$10.67B
FSS:
$339.50M
MMC:
$7.08B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSS achieves a -2.88% return, which is significantly lower than MMC's 7.56% return. Over the past 10 years, FSS has outperformed MMC with an annualized return of 20.62%, while MMC has yielded a comparatively lower 16.62% annualized return.
FSS
-2.88%
17.44%
-0.56%
2.70%
28.69%
20.62%
MMC
7.56%
-2.78%
1.38%
11.98%
18.62%
16.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FSS vs. MMC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FSS
MMC
FSS vs. MMC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federal Signal Corporation (FSS) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
FSS vs. MMC - Dividend Comparison
FSS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than MMC's 1.44% yield.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSS Federal Signal Corporation | 0.56% | 0.52% | 0.51% | 0.77% | 0.83% | 0.96% | 0.99% | 1.56% | 1.39% | 1.79% | 1.58% | 0.58% |
MMC Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. | 1.44% | 1.44% | 1.37% | 1.36% | 1.15% | 1.57% | 1.56% | 1.98% | 1.76% | 1.92% | 2.13% | 1.85% |
Drawdowns
FSS vs. MMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSS drawdown since its inception was -83.42%, which is greater than MMC's maximum drawdown of -67.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSS and MMC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
FSS vs. MMC - Volatility Comparison
Federal Signal Corporation (FSS) has a higher volatility of 10.73% compared to Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC) at 8.49%. This indicates that FSS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
FSS vs. MMC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Federal Signal Corporation and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FSS vs. MMC - Profitability Comparison
FSS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Federal Signal Corporation reported a gross profit of 130.80M and revenue of 463.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.2%.
MMC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.21B and revenue of 7.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.5%.
FSS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Federal Signal Corporation reported an operating income of 65.70M and revenue of 463.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.2%.
MMC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.01B and revenue of 7.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.4%.
FSS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Federal Signal Corporation reported a net income of 46.30M and revenue of 463.80M, resulting in a net margin of 10.0%.
MMC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. reported a net income of 1.38B and revenue of 7.06B, resulting in a net margin of 19.6%.