FSS vs. GFF
FSS (Federal Signal Corporation) and GFF (Griffon Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — FSS in Pollution & Treatment Controls, GFF in Tools & Accessories. Over the past 10 years, FSS returned 26.19%/yr vs 22.60%/yr for GFF. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FSS vs. GFF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSS achieves a 8.44% return, which is significantly lower than GFF's 22.04% return. Over the past 10 years, FSS has outperformed GFF with an annualized return of 26.19%, while GFF has yielded a comparatively lower 22.60% annualized return.
FSS
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 4.29%
- YTD
- 8.44%
- 6M
- 4.00%
- 1Y
- 16.83%
- 3Y*
- 24.44%
- 5Y*
- 24.98%
- 10Y*
- 26.19%
GFF
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- 5.62%
- YTD
- 22.04%
- 6M
- 17.24%
- 1Y
- 31.74%
- 3Y*
- 35.03%
- 5Y*
- 33.30%
- 10Y*
- 22.60%
FSS vs. GFF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSS Federal Signal Corporation | 8.44% | 18.21% | 21.05% | 66.26% | 8.22% | 31.80% | 3.99% | 63.92% | 0.39% | 30.79% |
GFF Griffon Corporation | 22.04% | 4.42% | 17.97% | 83.96% | 36.91% | 41.60% | 1.83% | 97.74% | -44.92% | -21.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSS and GFF is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 1982 | 0.32 |
The correlation between FSS and GFF shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FSS:
$7.22B
GFF:
$4.09B
FSS:
$4.41
GFF:
$0.76
FSS:
26.65
GFF:
118.37
FSS:
1.04
GFF:
1.53
FSS:
3.08
GFF:
1.76
FSS:
5.03
GFF:
43.26
FSS:
$2.34B
GFF:
$2.35B
FSS:
$670.20M
GFF:
$1.00B
FSS:
$435.10M
GFF:
$245.38M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSS vs. GFF — Risk / Return Rank
FSS
GFF
FSS vs. GFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federal Signal Corporation (FSS) and Griffon Corporation (GFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSS | GFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.18 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 1.14 | -0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.54 | 3.00 | -1.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSS vs. GFF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSS drawdown since its inception was -83.43%, smaller than the maximum GFF drawdown of -96.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSS and GFF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSS | GFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.43% | -96.84% | +13.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.04% | -27.85% | +8.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.54% | -27.85% | -3.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.96% | -39.02% | +6.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.96% | -61.32% | +28.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.13% | -6.16% | -2.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.56% | -55.45% | +32.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.96% | 10.62% | +0.34% |
Volatility
FSS vs. GFF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Federal Signal Corporation (FSS) is 9.95%, while Griffon Corporation (GFF) has a volatility of 11.76%. This indicates that FSS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSS | GFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.95% | 11.76% | -1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.76% | 26.63% | -2.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.67% | 36.66% | -0.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.75% | 41.30% | -10.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.67% | 45.43% | -13.76% |
Dividends
FSS vs. GFF - Dividend Comparison
FSS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than GFF's 0.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSS Federal Signal Corporation | 0.49% | 0.52% | 0.52% | 0.51% | 0.77% | 0.83% | 0.96% | 0.99% | 1.56% | 1.39% | 1.79% | 1.58% |
GFF Griffon Corporation | 0.94% | 1.03% | 0.88% | 4.10% | 6.62% | 1.16% | 1.50% | 1.44% | 12.27% | 1.23% | 0.80% | 0.96% |
Financials
FSS vs. GFF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Federal Signal Corporation and Griffon Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FSS vs. GFF - Profitability Comparison
FSS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federal Signal Corporation reported a gross profit of 179.40M and revenue of 625.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.7%.
GFF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Griffon Corporation reported a gross profit of 191.99M and revenue of 421.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.5%.
FSS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federal Signal Corporation reported an operating income of 99.70M and revenue of 625.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.9%.
GFF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Griffon Corporation reported an operating income of 87.35M and revenue of 421.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.
FSS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federal Signal Corporation reported a net income of 70.40M and revenue of 625.60M, resulting in a net margin of 11.3%.
GFF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Griffon Corporation reported a net income of 46.94M and revenue of 421.86M, resulting in a net margin of 11.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FSS and GFF have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GFF has higher volatility (11.76%) compared to FSS (9.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSS dropped -83.43% vs GFF's -96.84%.
GFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSS and GFF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer