PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSRPX vs. VDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSRPX vs. VDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSRPX achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly lower than VDC's 5.75% return. Over the past 10 years, FSRPX has outperformed VDC with an annualized return of 12.26%, while VDC has yielded a comparatively lower 7.59% annualized return.


FSRPX

1D
-0.69%
1M
-3.26%
YTD
2.43%
6M
-9.62%
1Y
-3.29%
3Y*
12.13%
5Y*
3.14%
10Y*
12.26%

VDC

1D
0.61%
1M
-3.32%
YTD
5.75%
6M
4.31%
1Y
1.24%
3Y*
7.43%
5Y*
6.06%
10Y*
7.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSRPX vs. VDC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSRPX
Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio
2.43%-4.15%23.28%26.94%-29.44%18.25%44.27%26.33%4.58%25.55%
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
5.75%2.17%13.30%2.38%-1.79%17.64%10.86%26.11%-7.79%11.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FSRPX and VDC is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.61

The correlation between FSRPX and VDC shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSRPX vs. VDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSRPX
FSRPX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FSRPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRPX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRPX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

VDC
VDC Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
VDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDC Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
VDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDC Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSRPX vs. VDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSRPXVDCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.15

0.10

-0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.06

0.23

-0.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.03

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.16

0.13

-0.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.38

0.28

-0.66

FSRPX vs. VDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSRPX Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the VDC Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSRPX and VDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSRPXVDCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

0.10

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.46

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.52

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.66

-0.02

Drawdowns

FSRPX vs. VDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSRPX drawdown since its inception was -55.75%, which is greater than VDC's maximum drawdown of -34.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRPX and VDC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSRPXVDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.75%

-34.24%

-21.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.79%

-9.28%

-8.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.58%

-11.78%

-10.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.01%

-16.55%

-22.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.01%

-25.31%

-13.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.03%

-8.52%

-2.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.09%

-3.73%

-5.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.49%

4.49%

+3.00%

Volatility

FSRPX vs. VDC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX) has a higher volatility of 4.65% compared to Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) at 4.09%. This indicates that FSRPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSRPXVDCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.65%

4.09%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.52%

9.76%

+6.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.26%

12.36%

+6.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.72%

13.13%

+9.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.62%

14.64%

+6.98%

FSRPX vs. VDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSRPX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than VDC's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSRPX vs. VDC - Dividend Comparison

FSRPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.69%, more than VDC's 2.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSRPX
Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio
6.69%8.75%12.41%7.40%2.90%15.92%6.82%2.13%2.17%3.37%0.14%1.22%
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
2.17%2.26%2.33%2.65%2.37%2.14%2.50%2.44%2.78%2.52%2.39%2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSRPX and VDC have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSRPX has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to VDC (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSRPX dropped -55.75% vs VDC's -34.24%.

VDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSRPX and VDC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer