FSPGX vs. FCPGX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FSPGX (Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund) and FCPGX (Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - FSPGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FCPGX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FSPGX returned 15.40%/yr vs 8.07%/yr for FCPGX. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FSPGX charges 0.04%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for FCPGX.

Performance

FSPGX vs. FCPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSPGX achieves a 7.15% return, which is significantly lower than FCPGX's 17.99% return.

FSPGX

• 1D: -1.33%
• 1M: 5.13%
• YTD: 7.15%
• 6M: 6.29%
• 1Y: 25.29%
• 3Y*: 24.97%
• 5Y*: 15.40%
• 10Y*: —

FCPGX

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 1.35%
• YTD: 17.99%
• 6M: 14.58%
• 1Y: 37.19%
• 3Y*: 20.62%
• 5Y*: 8.07%
• 10Y*: 14.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSPGX vs. FCPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	7.15%	18.54%	33.27%	42.77%	-29.17%	27.57%	38.46%	36.38%	-1.79%	27.70%
FCPGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund	17.99%	11.20%	20.56%	19.02%	-25.34%	10.50%	36.41%	36.31%	-4.57%	28.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FSPGX and FCPGX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.80

The correlation between FSPGX and FCPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FSPGX vs. FCPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSPGX

FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 27
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

FCPGX

FCPGX Risk / Return Rank: 43
FCPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
FCPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
FCPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
FCPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
FCPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSPGX vs. FCPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSPGX	FCPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	1.77	-0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.29	2.44	-0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.30	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.60	2.86	-1.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.36	11.49	-6.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSPGX vs. FCPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSPGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the FCPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSPGX and FCPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSPGX	FCPGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.67	1.77	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	0.35	+0.38
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.89	0.53	+0.36

Drawdowns

FSPGX vs. FCPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSPGX drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, smaller than the maximum FCPGX drawdown of -59.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSPGX and FCPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSPGX	FCPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.66%	-59.11%	+26.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.17%	-13.12%	-3.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.32%	-28.69%	+5.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.66%	-39.04%	+6.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.70%	-0.87%	-0.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.37%	-10.70%	+4.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.81%	3.26%	+1.55%

Volatility

FSPGX vs. FCPGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) is 3.68%, while Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) has a volatility of 6.52%. This indicates that FSPGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSPGX	FCPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.68%	6.52%	-2.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.65%	16.19%	-4.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.45%	21.19%	-5.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.50%	23.48%	-1.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.55%	22.84%	-1.29%

FSPGX vs. FCPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSPGX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FCPGX's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSPGX vs. FCPGX - Dividend Comparison

FSPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than FCPGX's 5.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCPGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund	5.41%	6.38%	1.37%	0.00%	0.00%	19.27%	8.19%	5.31%	14.35%	6.88%	1.53%	4.32%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	0.32%	0.34%	0.37%	0.73%	0.86%	2.22%	1.76%	1.04%	1.32%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSPGX and FCPGX in my portfolio?

FSPGX and FCPGX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSPGX or FCPGX?

FCPGX has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to FSPGX (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSPGX dropped -32.66% vs FCPGX's -59.11%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.