FSOPX vs. VB
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund (FSOPX) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB).
FSOPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 22, 2007. VB is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Small Cap. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FSOPX or VB.
Correlation
The correlation between FSOPX and VB is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FSOPX vs. VB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FSOPX:
-0.31
VB:
0.12
FSOPX:
-0.28
VB:
0.31
FSOPX:
0.96
VB:
1.04
FSOPX:
-0.21
VB:
0.09
FSOPX:
-0.76
VB:
0.29
FSOPX:
9.66%
VB:
8.02%
FSOPX:
23.84%
VB:
22.44%
FSOPX:
-61.73%
VB:
-59.57%
FSOPX:
-24.83%
VB:
-13.84%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FSOPX having a -6.84% return and VB slightly higher at -6.55%. Over the past 10 years, FSOPX has underperformed VB with an annualized return of 1.52%, while VB has yielded a comparatively higher 7.93% annualized return.
FSOPX
-6.84%
16.10%
-14.06%
-7.36%
4.72%
1.52%
VB
-6.55%
15.43%
-10.30%
2.76%
12.26%
7.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSOPX vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSOPX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VB's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FSOPX vs. VB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FSOPX
VB
FSOPX vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund (FSOPX) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FSOPX vs. VB - Dividend Comparison
FSOPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.10%, more than VB's 1.51% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSOPX Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund | 10.10% | 9.41% | 0.98% | 5.16% | 30.85% | 2.01% | 6.67% | 14.62% | 11.15% | 0.69% | 6.15% | 5.74% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 1.51% | 1.30% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.67% | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.48% | 1.43% |
Drawdowns
FSOPX vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSOPX drawdown since its inception was -61.73%, roughly equal to the maximum VB drawdown of -59.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSOPX and VB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FSOPX vs. VB - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund (FSOPX) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) have volatilities of 11.23% and 11.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.