FSMVX vs. SMVLX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Mid Cap Value Fund (FSMVX) and Smead Value Fund (SMVLX).
FSMVX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 15, 2001. SMVLX is managed by Smead Funds. It was launched on Jan 2, 2008.
Performance
FSMVX vs. SMVLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSMVX vs. SMVLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMVX Fidelity Mid Cap Value Fund | 0.59% | 13.06% | 14.53% | 22.59% | -10.64% | 34.00% | 0.95% | 23.57% | -18.91% | 17.06% |
SMVLX Smead Value Fund | 7.13% | 5.05% | 4.78% | 16.87% | -2.79% | 42.46% | 1.71% | 26.29% | -4.79% | 19.73% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSMVX achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly lower than SMVLX's 7.13% return. Over the past 10 years, FSMVX has underperformed SMVLX with an annualized return of 9.66%, while SMVLX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.46% annualized return.
FSMVX
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- -9.32%
- YTD
- 0.59%
- 6M
- 5.73%
- 1Y
- 19.31%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.25%
- 10Y*
- 9.66%
SMVLX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -1.50%
- YTD
- 7.13%
- 6M
- 7.45%
- 1Y
- 16.08%
- 3Y*
- 11.29%
- 5Y*
- 9.68%
- 10Y*
- 11.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSMVX vs. SMVLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSMVX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than SMVLX's 1.26% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSMVX vs. SMVLX — Risk / Return Rank
FSMVX
SMVLX
FSMVX vs. SMVLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Mid Cap Value Fund (FSMVX) and Smead Value Fund (SMVLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSMVX | SMVLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.93 | 0.83 | +0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.42 | 1.27 | +0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.18 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | 0.94 | +0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.92 | 3.54 | +1.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSMVX | SMVLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 0.83 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.53 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.59 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.68 | -0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSMVX and SMVLX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FSMVX vs. SMVLX - Dividend Comparison
FSMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.82%, more than SMVLX's 1.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMVX Fidelity Mid Cap Value Fund | 7.82% | 8.28% | 10.41% | 1.17% | 13.12% | 1.30% | 1.99% | 1.87% | 14.79% | 8.92% | 1.34% | 5.15% |
SMVLX Smead Value Fund | 1.56% | 1.67% | 1.08% | 1.34% | 1.78% | 3.91% | 1.40% | 3.83% | 7.47% | 0.22% | 3.14% | 3.10% |
Drawdowns
FSMVX vs. SMVLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSMVX drawdown since its inception was -62.96%, which is greater than SMVLX's maximum drawdown of -39.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMVX and SMVLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSMVX | SMVLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.96% | -39.56% | -23.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.74% | -16.61% | +1.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.70% | -24.62% | +0.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.11% | -39.56% | -5.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.30% | -2.69% | -7.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.00% | -4.63% | -4.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.59% | 4.41% | -0.82% |
Volatility
FSMVX vs. SMVLX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Mid Cap Value Fund (FSMVX) has a higher volatility of 5.64% compared to Smead Value Fund (SMVLX) at 3.09%. This indicates that FSMVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMVLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSMVX | SMVLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.64% | 3.09% | +2.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.77% | 10.37% | +1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.47% | 20.87% | +0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.10% | 18.47% | +1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.02% | 19.49% | +1.53% |