FSMEX vs. VONG
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Select Medical Technology and Devices Portfolio (FSMEX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG).
FSMEX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 28, 1998. VONG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FSMEX or VONG.
Performance
FSMEX vs. VONG - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSMEX achieves a 9.80% return, which is significantly lower than VONG's 30.63% return. Over the past 10 years, FSMEX has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 6.21%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.39% annualized return.
FSMEX
9.80%
1.75%
5.92%
20.24%
3.11%
6.21%
VONG
30.63%
4.08%
14.24%
36.29%
19.51%
16.39%
Key characteristics
| FSMEX | VONG | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.31 | 2.17 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.89 | 2.83 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.23 | 1.40 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.54 | 2.77 |
| Martin Ratio | 4.75 | 10.89 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.26% | 3.33% |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.40% | 16.70% |
| Max Drawdown | -43.45% | -32.72% |
| Current Drawdown | -23.85% | -1.16% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSMEX vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSMEX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.08% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between FSMEX and VONG is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FSMEX vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Medical Technology and Devices Portfolio (FSMEX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FSMEX vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison
FSMEX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VONG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMEX Fidelity Select Medical Technology and Devices Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 11.71% | 5.17% | 9.84% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.59% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% | 1.43% | 1.28% |
Drawdowns
FSMEX vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSMEX drawdown since its inception was -43.45%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMEX and VONG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FSMEX vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Select Medical Technology and Devices Portfolio (FSMEX) is 3.70%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a volatility of 5.40%. This indicates that FSMEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.