PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSMDX vs. IMCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSMDX vs. IMCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSMDX achieves a 14.62% return, which is significantly lower than IMCB's 19.07% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSMDX having a 11.54% annualized return and IMCB not far behind at 11.25%.


FSMDX

1D
-0.28%
1M
-0.61%
6M
10.55%
YTD
14.62%
1Y
20.38%
3Y*
14.99%
5Y*
8.24%
10Y*
11.54%
ALL TIME*
12.62%

IMCB

1D
1.01%
1M
1.00%
6M
14.82%
YTD
19.07%
1Y
24.45%
3Y*
17.04%
5Y*
9.36%
10Y*
11.25%
ALL TIME*
10.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$3.07M$3.70M$3.21M

FSMDX vs. IMCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSMDX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund
14.62%10.58%15.55%17.20%-17.27%22.56%17.13%30.53%-9.38%18.04%
IMCB
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
19.07%10.25%15.10%16.37%-16.09%22.81%13.35%31.49%-11.53%19.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FSMDX and IMCB is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011

0.97

The correlation between FSMDX and IMCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSMDX vs. IMCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSMDX
FSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

IMCB
IMCB Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
IMCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMCB Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
IMCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMCB Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSMDX vs. IMCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSMDXIMCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.34

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

3.05

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.94

12.23

-3.29

FSMDX vs. IMCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSMDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the IMCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMDX and IMCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSMDX vs. IMCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMDX drawdown since its inception was -40.35%, smaller than the maximum IMCB drawdown of -58.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMDX and IMCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSMDXIMCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.35%

-58.80%

+18.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.16%

-8.05%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.92%

-19.80%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.07%

-25.15%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.35%

-40.99%

+0.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

0.00%

-0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.91%

-7.68%

+2.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

2.00%

+0.10%

Volatility

FSMDX vs. IMCB - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) have volatilities of 2.43% and 2.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSMDXIMCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.43%

2.51%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.22%

9.95%

+0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.71%

13.05%

+0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.26%

17.57%

+0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.27%

19.61%

-0.34%

FSMDX vs. IMCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSMDX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than IMCB's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FSMDX vs. IMCB - Dividend Comparison

FSMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than IMCB's 1.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSMDX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund
0.76%1.10%2.46%1.39%2.07%3.35%2.34%2.86%2.21%2.17%2.23%2.84%
IMCB
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
1.20%1.42%1.43%1.55%1.70%1.08%1.12%1.32%1.80%1.31%1.79%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, FSMDX and IMCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IMCB has higher volatility (2.51%) compared to FSMDX (2.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMDX dropped -40.35% vs IMCB's -58.80%.

IMCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSMDX and IMCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer