FSMD vs. VWO
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO).
FSMD and VWO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FSMD is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index. It was launched on Feb 26, 2019. VWO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE Emerging Index. It was launched on Mar 4, 2005. Both FSMD and VWO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FSMD vs. VWO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSMD vs. VWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF | 1.72% | 8.70% | 15.18% | 17.37% | -11.15% | 26.40% | 8.94% | 8.81% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 0.54% | 25.60% | 10.59% | 9.25% | -17.98% | 1.26% | 15.17% | 10.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSMD achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly higher than VWO's 0.54% return.
FSMD
- 1D
- 3.04%
- 1M
- -4.67%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 2.29%
- 1Y
- 15.81%
- 3Y*
- 13.07%
- 5Y*
- 7.84%
- 10Y*
- —
VWO
- 1D
- 3.11%
- 1M
- -6.97%
- YTD
- 0.54%
- 6M
- 1.72%
- 1Y
- 22.75%
- 3Y*
- 13.73%
- 5Y*
- 3.84%
- 10Y*
- 7.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSMD vs. VWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSMD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VWO's 0.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSMD vs. VWO — Risk / Return Rank
FSMD
VWO
FSMD vs. VWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSMD | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.79 | 1.28 | -0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.26 | 1.81 | -0.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.26 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 1.85 | -0.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.61 | 7.12 | -1.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSMD | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 1.28 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.22 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.25 | +0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSMD and VWO is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FSMD vs. VWO - Dividend Comparison
FSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than VWO's 2.68% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF | 1.37% | 1.33% | 1.29% | 1.37% | 1.54% | 1.18% | 1.32% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 2.68% | 2.79% | 3.20% | 3.52% | 4.11% | 2.63% | 1.91% | 3.23% | 2.88% | 2.30% | 2.52% | 3.26% |
Drawdowns
FSMD vs. VWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSMD drawdown since its inception was -40.67%, smaller than the maximum VWO drawdown of -67.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMD and VWO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSMD | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.67% | -67.68% | +27.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.63% | -12.23% | -0.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.16% | -32.80% | +10.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.65% | -8.41% | +2.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.12% | -15.93% | +9.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 3.18% | -0.17% |
Volatility
FSMD vs. VWO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) is 6.73%, while Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a volatility of 8.17%. This indicates that FSMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSMD | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.73% | 8.17% | -1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.32% | 12.26% | -0.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.07% | 17.83% | +2.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.43% | 17.21% | +1.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.54% | 19.18% | +2.36% |