FSM vs. SLVP

In the year-to-date period, FSM achieves a 42.89% return, which is significantly higher than SLVP's 36.74% return. Over the past 10 years, FSM has underperformed SLVP with an annualized return of 5.28%, while SLVP has yielded a comparatively higher 7.63% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM) and iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF (SLVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FSM Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the SLVP Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSM and SLVP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FSM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.

The maximum FSM drawdown since its inception was -92.25%, which is greater than SLVP's maximum drawdown of -80.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSM and SLVP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM) has a higher volatility of 20.23% compared to iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF (SLVP) at 18.98%. This indicates that FSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLVP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.