FSM vs. SLVP
Compare and contrast key facts about Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM) and iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF (SLVP).
SLVP is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jan 31, 2012.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FSM or SLVP.
Key characteristics
| FSM | SLVP | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 18.91% | 26.46% |
| 1Y Return | 50.99% | 53.79% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 5.88% | -4.50% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 7.44% | 6.64% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 0.36% | 5.09% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.00 | 1.39 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.64 | 2.03 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.20 | 1.24 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.74 | 0.84 |
| Martin Ratio | 2.77 | 5.19 |
| Ulcer Index | 19.30% | 10.33% |
| Daily Std Dev | 53.26% | 38.58% |
| Max Drawdown | -92.25% | -80.47% |
| Current Drawdown | -51.89% | -41.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSM and SLVP is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FSM vs. SLVP - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FSM achieves a 18.91% return, which is significantly lower than SLVP's 26.46% return. Over the past 10 years, FSM has underperformed SLVP with an annualized return of 0.36%, while SLVP has yielded a comparatively higher 5.09% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FSM vs. SLVP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM) and iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF (SLVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FSM vs. SLVP - Dividend Comparison
FSM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSM Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF | 0.69% | 0.87% | 0.64% | 1.62% | 2.39% | 2.02% | 1.27% | 0.85% | 2.32% | 0.71% | 2.03% | 1.72% |
Drawdowns
FSM vs. SLVP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSM drawdown since its inception was -92.25%, which is greater than SLVP's maximum drawdown of -80.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSM and SLVP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FSM vs. SLVP - Volatility Comparison
Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM) has a higher volatility of 15.22% compared to iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF (SLVP) at 11.79%. This indicates that FSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLVP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.