PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FSM vs. SLVP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FSM and SLVP is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

FSM vs. SLVP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM) and iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF (SLVP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-14.69%
-4.79%
FSM
SLVP

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FSM:

0.32

SLVP:

0.90

Sortino Ratio

FSM:

0.84

SLVP:

1.47

Omega Ratio

FSM:

1.10

SLVP:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

FSM:

0.24

SLVP:

0.55

Martin Ratio

FSM:

0.85

SLVP:

3.26

Ulcer Index

FSM:

20.26%

SLVP:

10.70%

Daily Std Dev

FSM:

53.74%

SLVP:

38.84%

Max Drawdown

FSM:

-92.25%

SLVP:

-80.47%

Current Drawdown

FSM:

-54.93%

SLVP:

-43.74%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSM achieves a 0.23% return, which is significantly lower than SLVP's 6.59% return. Over the past 10 years, FSM has underperformed SLVP with an annualized return of -0.99%, while SLVP has yielded a comparatively higher 3.72% annualized return.


FSM

YTD

0.23%

1M

-6.52%

6M

-14.68%

1Y

21.47%

5Y*

2.14%

10Y*

-0.99%

SLVP

YTD

6.59%

1M

-2.38%

6M

-4.78%

1Y

39.87%

5Y*

4.73%

10Y*

3.72%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FSM vs. SLVP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FSM is 5757
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FSM is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FSM is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FSM is 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FSM is 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FSM is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

SLVP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SLVP is 3636
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SLVP is 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SLVP is 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SLVP is 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SLVP is 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SLVP is 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FSM vs. SLVP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM) and iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF (SLVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FSM, currently valued at 0.32, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.320.90
The chart of Sortino ratio for FSM, currently valued at 0.84, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.841.47
The chart of Omega ratio for FSM, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.101.17
The chart of Calmar ratio for FSM, currently valued at 0.24, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.240.55
The chart of Martin ratio for FSM, currently valued at 0.85, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.000.853.26
FSM
SLVP

The current FSM Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the SLVP Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSM and SLVP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.32
0.90
FSM
SLVP

Dividends

FSM vs. SLVP - Dividend Comparison

FSM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FSM
Fortuna Silver Mines Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SLVP
iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF
0.98%1.05%0.87%0.64%1.62%2.39%2.02%1.27%0.85%2.32%0.71%2.03%

Drawdowns

FSM vs. SLVP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSM drawdown since its inception was -92.25%, which is greater than SLVP's maximum drawdown of -80.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSM and SLVP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-55.00%-50.00%-45.00%-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-54.93%
-43.74%
FSM
SLVP

Volatility

FSM vs. SLVP - Volatility Comparison

Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM) has a higher volatility of 14.35% compared to iShares MSCI Global Silver Miners ETF (SLVP) at 10.73%. This indicates that FSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLVP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
14.35%
10.73%
FSM
SLVP
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab