PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FSM vs. LLY
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


FSMLLY
YTD Return18.91%41.16%
1Y Return50.99%34.54%
3Y Return (Ann)5.88%48.26%
5Y Return (Ann)7.44%51.11%
10Y Return (Ann)0.36%30.91%
Sharpe Ratio1.001.29
Sortino Ratio1.641.90
Omega Ratio1.201.26
Calmar Ratio0.741.98
Martin Ratio2.776.53
Ulcer Index19.30%5.80%
Daily Std Dev53.26%29.34%
Max Drawdown-92.25%-68.27%
Current Drawdown-51.89%-14.70%

Fundamentals


FSMLLY
Market Cap$1.42B$790.25B
EPS$0.07$9.31
PE Ratio64.2989.41
PEG Ratio0.000.78
Total Revenue (TTM)$711.29M$40.86B
Gross Profit (TTM)$218.12M$33.33B
EBITDA (TTM)$218.71M$13.78B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between FSM and LLY is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

FSM vs. LLY - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FSM achieves a 18.91% return, which is significantly lower than LLY's 41.16% return. Over the past 10 years, FSM has underperformed LLY with an annualized return of 0.36%, while LLY has yielded a comparatively higher 30.91% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-12.57%
7.52%
FSM
LLY

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FSM vs. LLY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FSM, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.00
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FSM, currently valued at 1.64, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.64
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FSM, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.20
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FSM, currently valued at 0.74, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.74
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FSM, currently valued at 2.77, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.77
LLY
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LLY, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.29
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LLY, currently valued at 1.90, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.90
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LLY, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.26
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LLY, currently valued at 1.98, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.98
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LLY, currently valued at 6.53, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.006.53

FSM vs. LLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSM Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is comparable to the LLY Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSM and LLY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.00
1.29
FSM
LLY

Dividends

FSM vs. LLY - Dividend Comparison

FSM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FSM
Fortuna Silver Mines Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
0.61%0.78%1.07%1.23%1.75%1.96%1.95%2.46%2.77%2.37%2.84%3.84%

Drawdowns

FSM vs. LLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSM drawdown since its inception was -92.25%, which is greater than LLY's maximum drawdown of -68.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSM and LLY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-51.89%
-14.70%
FSM
LLY

Volatility

FSM vs. LLY - Volatility Comparison

Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM) has a higher volatility of 15.22% compared to Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) at 9.85%. This indicates that FSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
15.22%
9.85%
FSM
LLY

Financials

FSM vs. LLY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. and Eli Lilly and Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items