PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FSLY vs. RNG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


FSLYRNG
YTD Return-60.11%8.22%
1Y Return-58.91%20.82%
3Y Return (Ann)-47.78%-48.34%
5Y Return (Ann)-19.27%-26.46%
Sharpe Ratio-0.830.70
Sortino Ratio-1.051.25
Omega Ratio0.841.16
Calmar Ratio-0.610.34
Martin Ratio-1.032.41
Ulcer Index56.41%13.29%
Daily Std Dev70.05%45.99%
Max Drawdown-95.63%-94.29%
Current Drawdown-94.49%-91.71%

Fundamentals


FSLYRNG
Market Cap$990.52M$3.28B
EPS-$1.08-$1.05
Total Revenue (TTM)$540.87M$2.36B
Gross Profit (TTM)$294.35M$1.66B
EBITDA (TTM)-$149.40M-$148.49M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between FSLY and RNG is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

FSLY vs. RNG - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FSLY achieves a -60.11% return, which is significantly lower than RNG's 8.22% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-20.14%
0.44%
FSLY
RNG

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FSLY vs. RNG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fastly, Inc. (FSLY) and RingCentral, Inc. (RNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSLY
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FSLY, currently valued at -0.83, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.83
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FSLY, currently valued at -1.05, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-1.05
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FSLY, currently valued at 0.84, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.84
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FSLY, currently valued at -0.61, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.61
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FSLY, currently valued at -1.03, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-1.03
RNG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RNG, currently valued at 0.70, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.70
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for RNG, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.25
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for RNG, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.16
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for RNG, currently valued at 0.34, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.34
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for RNG, currently valued at 2.41, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.41

FSLY vs. RNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSLY Sharpe Ratio is -0.83, which is lower than the RNG Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSLY and RNG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.83
0.70
FSLY
RNG

Dividends

FSLY vs. RNG - Dividend Comparison

Neither FSLY nor RNG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FSLY vs. RNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSLY drawdown since its inception was -95.63%, roughly equal to the maximum RNG drawdown of -94.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSLY and RNG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-96.00%-95.00%-94.00%-93.00%-92.00%-91.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-94.49%
-91.71%
FSLY
RNG

Volatility

FSLY vs. RNG - Volatility Comparison

Fastly, Inc. (FSLY) has a higher volatility of 15.48% compared to RingCentral, Inc. (RNG) at 10.63%. This indicates that FSLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
15.48%
10.63%
FSLY
RNG

Financials

FSLY vs. RNG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fastly, Inc. and RingCentral, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items