PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FSKGX vs. IVOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FSKGX and IVOO is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.8

Performance

FSKGX vs. IVOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth Strategies K6 Fund (FSKGX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

60.00%80.00%100.00%120.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
64.98%
79.62%
FSKGX
IVOO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FSKGX:

0.02

IVOO:

-0.11

Sortino Ratio

FSKGX:

0.21

IVOO:

-0.01

Omega Ratio

FSKGX:

1.03

IVOO:

1.00

Calmar Ratio

FSKGX:

0.02

IVOO:

-0.10

Martin Ratio

FSKGX:

0.06

IVOO:

-0.36

Ulcer Index

FSKGX:

9.38%

IVOO:

6.63%

Daily Std Dev

FSKGX:

26.61%

IVOO:

21.35%

Max Drawdown

FSKGX:

-49.53%

IVOO:

-42.33%

Current Drawdown

FSKGX:

-26.69%

IVOO:

-18.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSKGX achieves a -9.83% return, which is significantly higher than IVOO's -11.74% return.


FSKGX

YTD

-9.83%

1M

-4.55%

6M

-12.58%

1Y

1.97%

5Y*

4.83%

10Y*

N/A

IVOO

YTD

-11.74%

1M

-7.93%

6M

-13.45%

1Y

-1.34%

5Y*

13.63%

10Y*

7.65%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FSKGX vs. IVOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSKGX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than IVOO's 0.10% expense ratio.


FSKGX
Fidelity Growth Strategies K6 Fund
Expense ratio chart for FSKGX: current value is 0.45%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
FSKGX: 0.45%
Expense ratio chart for IVOO: current value is 0.10%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
IVOO: 0.10%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FSKGX vs. IVOO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSKGX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FSKGX is 3333
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FSKGX is 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FSKGX is 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FSKGX is 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FSKGX is 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FSKGX is 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

IVOO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IVOO is 2121
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IVOO is 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IVOO is 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IVOO is 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IVOO is 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IVOO is 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FSKGX vs. IVOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Strategies K6 Fund (FSKGX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FSKGX, currently valued at 0.02, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.00
FSKGX: 0.02
IVOO: -0.11
The chart of Sortino ratio for FSKGX, currently valued at 0.21, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
FSKGX: 0.21
IVOO: -0.01
The chart of Omega ratio for FSKGX, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.00
FSKGX: 1.03
IVOO: 1.00
The chart of Calmar ratio for FSKGX, currently valued at 0.02, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.00
FSKGX: 0.02
IVOO: -0.10
The chart of Martin ratio for FSKGX, currently valued at 0.06, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0040.0050.00
FSKGX: 0.06
IVOO: -0.36

The current FSKGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is higher than the IVOO Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSKGX and IVOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.02
-0.11
FSKGX
IVOO

Dividends

FSKGX vs. IVOO - Dividend Comparison

FSKGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than IVOO's 1.80% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FSKGX
Fidelity Growth Strategies K6 Fund
0.17%0.16%0.32%0.27%0.00%0.11%0.50%0.85%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IVOO
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF
1.80%1.48%1.25%1.58%1.14%1.23%1.49%1.56%1.22%1.37%1.45%1.26%

Drawdowns

FSKGX vs. IVOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSKGX drawdown since its inception was -49.53%, which is greater than IVOO's maximum drawdown of -42.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSKGX and IVOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-26.69%
-18.63%
FSKGX
IVOO

Volatility

FSKGX vs. IVOO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Growth Strategies K6 Fund (FSKGX) has a higher volatility of 16.27% compared to Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) at 14.35%. This indicates that FSKGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
16.27%
14.35%
FSKGX
IVOO
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab