FSKGX vs. IVOO
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Growth Strategies K6 Fund (FSKGX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO).
FSKGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 25, 2017. IVOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Performance
FSKGX vs. IVOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSKGX vs. IVOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSKGX Fidelity Growth Strategies K6 Fund | -7.04% | 7.82% | 20.04% | 21.58% | -26.20% | 21.62% | 29.50% | 36.90% | -6.89% | 10.43% |
IVOO Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF | 2.57% | 7.47% | 13.77% | 16.45% | -13.17% | 24.61% | 13.61% | 26.18% | -11.33% | 10.90% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSKGX achieves a -7.04% return, which is significantly lower than IVOO's 2.57% return.
FSKGX
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- -11.40%
- YTD
- -7.04%
- 6M
- -14.07%
- 1Y
- 8.66%
- 3Y*
- 10.52%
- 5Y*
- 5.52%
- 10Y*
- —
IVOO
- 1D
- 2.97%
- 1M
- -5.28%
- YTD
- 2.57%
- 6M
- 4.28%
- 1Y
- 17.42%
- 3Y*
- 12.05%
- 5Y*
- 6.55%
- 10Y*
- 10.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSKGX vs. IVOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSKGX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than IVOO's 0.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSKGX vs. IVOO — Risk / Return Rank
FSKGX
IVOO
FSKGX vs. IVOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Strategies K6 Fund (FSKGX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSKGX | IVOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.34 | 0.82 | -0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.64 | 1.30 | -0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.18 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | 1.24 | -0.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.81 | 5.38 | -4.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSKGX | IVOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 | 0.82 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.33 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.58 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSKGX and IVOO is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FSKGX vs. IVOO - Dividend Comparison
FSKGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IVOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSKGX Fidelity Growth Strategies K6 Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.37% | 0.27% | 26.04% | 2.53% | 0.50% | 0.85% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVOO Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF | 1.32% | 1.35% | 1.30% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 1.14% | 1.23% | 1.49% | 1.56% | 1.22% | 1.37% | 1.45% |
Drawdowns
FSKGX vs. IVOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSKGX drawdown since its inception was -36.51%, smaller than the maximum IVOO drawdown of -42.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSKGX and IVOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSKGX | IVOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.51% | -42.33% | +5.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.39% | -14.17% | -2.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.51% | -24.22% | -12.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.39% | -6.10% | -10.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.05% | -5.31% | -3.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.28% | 3.27% | +2.01% |
Volatility
FSKGX vs. IVOO - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Growth Strategies K6 Fund (FSKGX) has a higher volatility of 7.62% compared to Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) at 6.56%. This indicates that FSKGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSKGX | IVOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.62% | 6.56% | +1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.97% | 11.90% | +4.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.16% | 21.22% | +3.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.82% | 19.73% | +3.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.78% | 21.17% | +1.61% |