FSKAX vs. IVV
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV).
FSKAX is managed by Fidelity. IVV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 15, 2000.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FSKAX or IVV.
Key characteristics
| FSKAX | IVV | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 23.69% | 24.49% |
| 1Y Return | 32.46% | 31.99% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.86% | 9.36% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 14.64% | 15.29% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 12.31% | 13.10% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.57 | 2.64 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.44 | 3.54 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.47 | 1.49 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.77 | 3.82 |
| Martin Ratio | 16.47 | 17.27 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.97% | 1.86% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.62% | 12.17% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.01% | -55.25% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.41% | -2.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSKAX and IVV is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FSKAX vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FSKAX having a 23.69% return and IVV slightly higher at 24.49%. Over the past 10 years, FSKAX has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 12.31%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 13.10% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSKAX vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSKAX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FSKAX vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FSKAX vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
FSKAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than IVV's 1.26% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | 1.17% | 1.41% | 1.62% | 1.15% | 1.45% | 1.80% | 2.06% | 1.66% | 1.82% | 1.96% | 1.63% | 1.54% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.26% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.99% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% | 1.83% | 1.80% |
Drawdowns
FSKAX vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSKAX drawdown since its inception was -35.01%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSKAX and IVV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FSKAX vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) have volatilities of 4.27% and 4.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.