FSHOX vs. IOO

In the year-to-date period, FSHOX achieves a -3.75% return, which is significantly lower than IOO's -3.25% return. Over the past 10 years, FSHOX has underperformed IOO with an annualized return of 7.86%, while IOO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.67% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FSHOX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than IOO's 0.40% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio (FSHOX) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FSHOX Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the IOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSHOX and IOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FSHOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than IOO's 1.11% yield.

The maximum FSHOX drawdown since its inception was -60.78%, which is greater than IOO's maximum drawdown of -55.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSHOX and IOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio (FSHOX) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) have volatilities of 6.74% and 6.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.