FSGGX vs. FFGCX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FSGGX (Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund) and FFGCX (Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund) are both mutual funds - FSGGX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI (All Country World Index) ex USA Index, while FFGCX is a Commodities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FSGGX returned 9.49%/yr vs 13.04%/yr for FFGCX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSGGX charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.94%/yr for FFGCX.

Performance

FSGGX vs. FFGCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGGX) and Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSGGX achieves a 15.86% return, which is significantly lower than FFGCX's 24.64% return. Over the past 10 years, FSGGX has underperformed FFGCX with an annualized return of 9.49%, while FFGCX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.04% annualized return.

FSGGX

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: 6.14%
• YTD: 15.86%
• 6M: 18.71%
• 1Y: 33.87%
• 3Y*: 20.16%
• 5Y*: 9.04%
• 10Y*: 9.49%

FFGCX

• 1D: 1.30%
• 1M: 0.79%
• YTD: 24.64%
• 6M: 27.09%
• 1Y: 52.31%
• 3Y*: 20.10%
• 5Y*: 13.70%
• 10Y*: 13.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSGGX vs. FFGCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSGGX Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund	15.86%	32.93%	5.30%	15.57%	-15.75%	7.74%	10.73%	21.36%	-13.93%	24.73%
FFGCX Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund	24.64%	28.66%	2.98%	-5.18%	20.69%	26.08%	6.04%	17.82%	-13.21%	17.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FSGGX and FFGCX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2011	0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between FSGGX and FFGCX has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FSGGX vs. FFGCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSGGX

FSGGX Risk / Return Rank: 59
FSGGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FSGGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
FSGGX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
FSGGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
FSGGX Martin Ratio Rank: 58

FFGCX

FFGCX Risk / Return Rank: 91
FFGCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
FFGCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FFGCX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FFGCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FFGCX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSGGX vs. FFGCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGGX) and Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSGGX	FFGCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.31	3.21	-0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.14	4.04	-0.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.54	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.97	7.09	-4.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.65	25.64	-13.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSGGX vs. FFGCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSGGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the FFGCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSGGX and FFGCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSGGX	FFGCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.31	3.21	-0.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	0.64	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59	0.58	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.35	+0.15

Drawdowns

FSGGX vs. FFGCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSGGX drawdown since its inception was -34.76%, smaller than the maximum FFGCX drawdown of -57.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSGGX and FFGCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSGGX	FFGCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.76%	-57.23%	+22.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.26%	-7.38%	-3.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.31%	-19.24%	+5.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.70%	-27.22%	-2.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.76%	-48.43%	+13.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.58%	+1.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.34%	-19.37%	+12.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.87%	2.04%	+0.83%

Volatility

FSGGX vs. FFGCX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGGX) has a higher volatility of 4.97% compared to Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) at 4.35%. This indicates that FSGGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFGCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSGGX	FFGCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.97%	4.35%	+0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.27%	13.28%	-1.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.53%	16.34%	-1.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.36%	21.37%	-6.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.19%	22.43%	-6.24%

FSGGX vs. FFGCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSGGX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than FFGCX's 0.94% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSGGX vs. FFGCX - Dividend Comparison

FSGGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, more than FFGCX's 2.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFGCX Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund	2.03%	2.53%	2.62%	2.01%	1.84%	3.39%	1.61%	2.98%	2.22%	0.36%	1.53%	2.86%
FSGGX Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund	2.33%	2.70%	2.91%	2.95%	2.64%	2.60%	1.71%	2.85%	2.66%	0.22%	0.05%	2.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSGGX and FFGCX in my portfolio?

FSGGX and FFGCX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSGGX or FFGCX?

FSGGX has higher volatility (4.97%) compared to FFGCX (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSGGX dropped -34.76% vs FFGCX's -57.23%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFGCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.