PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FSEC vs. RITM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FSEC and RITM is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.2

Performance

FSEC vs. RITM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF (FSEC) and Rithm Capital Corp. (RITM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-1.18%
10.00%
FSEC
RITM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FSEC:

0.64

RITM:

1.27

Sortino Ratio

FSEC:

0.95

RITM:

1.75

Omega Ratio

FSEC:

1.11

RITM:

1.23

Calmar Ratio

FSEC:

0.35

RITM:

1.65

Martin Ratio

FSEC:

2.06

RITM:

5.00

Ulcer Index

FSEC:

2.32%

RITM:

4.56%

Daily Std Dev

FSEC:

7.50%

RITM:

18.03%

Max Drawdown

FSEC:

-17.97%

RITM:

-81.11%

Current Drawdown

FSEC:

-6.22%

RITM:

-0.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSEC achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly lower than RITM's 10.25% return.


FSEC

YTD

0.85%

1M

0.93%

6M

-1.19%

1Y

5.27%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

RITM

YTD

10.25%

1M

5.20%

6M

10.00%

1Y

24.32%

5Y*

1.61%

10Y*

10.40%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FSEC vs. RITM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSEC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FSEC is 2121
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FSEC is 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FSEC is 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FSEC is 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FSEC is 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FSEC is 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

RITM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RITM is 8080
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RITM is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RITM is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RITM is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RITM is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RITM is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FSEC vs. RITM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF (FSEC) and Rithm Capital Corp. (RITM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FSEC, currently valued at 0.64, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.641.27
The chart of Sortino ratio for FSEC, currently valued at 0.95, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.951.75
The chart of Omega ratio for FSEC, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.111.23
The chart of Calmar ratio for FSEC, currently valued at 0.35, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.352.10
The chart of Martin ratio for FSEC, currently valued at 2.06, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.002.065.00
FSEC
RITM

The current FSEC Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the RITM Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSEC and RITM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.64
1.27
FSEC
RITM

Dividends

FSEC vs. RITM - Dividend Comparison

FSEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, less than RITM's 8.38% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FSEC
Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF
3.14%3.22%3.41%2.21%0.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RITM
Rithm Capital Corp.
8.38%9.23%9.36%12.24%8.40%5.03%12.41%14.07%11.07%11.70%14.39%12.37%

Drawdowns

FSEC vs. RITM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSEC drawdown since its inception was -17.97%, smaller than the maximum RITM drawdown of -81.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSEC and RITM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-6.22%
-0.75%
FSEC
RITM

Volatility

FSEC vs. RITM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF (FSEC) is 1.59%, while Rithm Capital Corp. (RITM) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that FSEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RITM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.59%
4.90%
FSEC
RITM
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab