PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSEC vs. RITM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSEC vs. RITM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF (FSEC) and Rithm Capital Corp. (RITM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSEC achieves a 1.14% return, which is significantly higher than RITM's -13.25% return.


FSEC

1D
0.27%
1M
0.68%
YTD
1.14%
6M
1.38%
1Y
6.18%
3Y*
4.91%
5Y*
0.58%
10Y*

RITM

1D
0.77%
1M
-0.54%
YTD
-13.25%
6M
-12.45%
1Y
-9.95%
3Y*
10.33%
5Y*
7.21%
10Y*
7.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSEC vs. RITM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FSEC
Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF
1.14%8.33%2.40%5.22%-12.62%-0.62%
RITM
Rithm Capital Corp.
-13.25%10.06%11.07%45.60%-14.44%10.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FSEC and RITM is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2021

0.17

The correlation between FSEC and RITM shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSEC vs. RITM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSEC
FSEC Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FSEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSEC Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FSEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSEC Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

RITM
RITM Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
RITM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RITM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
RITM Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
RITM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
RITM Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSEC vs. RITM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF (FSEC) and Rithm Capital Corp. (RITM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSECRITMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

0.94

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

-0.37

+2.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.70

-0.77

+7.47

FSEC vs. RITM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSEC Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is higher than the RITM Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSEC and RITM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSEC vs. RITM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSEC drawdown since its inception was -17.97%, smaller than the maximum RITM drawdown of -81.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSEC and RITM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSECRITMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.97%

-81.11%

+63.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.52%

-27.31%

+24.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.32%

-27.31%

+19.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.97%

-36.61%

+18.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

-21.62%

+20.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.58%

-15.97%

+9.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

13.01%

-12.09%

Volatility

FSEC vs. RITM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF (FSEC) is 1.29%, while Rithm Capital Corp. (RITM) has a volatility of 6.65%. This indicates that FSEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RITM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSECRITMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.29%

6.65%

-5.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.27%

19.17%

-15.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.29%

22.55%

-17.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.78%

27.45%

-20.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.60%

40.19%

-33.59%

Dividends

FSEC vs. RITM - Dividend Comparison

FSEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, less than RITM's 10.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSEC
Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF
4.43%4.22%3.22%3.41%2.21%0.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RITM
Rithm Capital Corp.
10.86%9.17%9.23%9.36%12.24%8.40%5.03%12.41%14.07%11.07%11.70%14.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSEC and RITM have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RITM has higher volatility (6.65%) compared to FSEC (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSEC dropped -17.97% vs RITM's -81.11%.

FSEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSEC and RITM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer