FSEAX vs. XOM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund (FSEAX) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM).

FSEAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 19, 1993.

Performance

FSEAX vs. XOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund (FSEAX) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FSEAX vs. XOM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSEAX Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund	0.63%	36.43%	21.80%	13.58%	-31.26%	-14.91%	73.43%	30.97%	-15.08%	45.13%
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation	41.92%	15.98%	11.26%	-6.26%	87.41%	57.58%	-36.21%	7.23%	-15.09%	-3.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSEAX achieves a 0.63% return, which is significantly lower than XOM's 41.92% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSEAX having a 12.43% annualized return and XOM not far behind at 12.20%.

FSEAX

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: -12.47%
• YTD: 0.63%
• 6M: 2.04%
• 1Y: 33.51%
• 3Y*: 20.81%
• 5Y*: 2.18%
• 10Y*: 12.43%

XOM

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: 11.25%
• YTD: 41.92%
• 6M: 52.80%
• 1Y: 47.56%
• 3Y*: 19.66%
• 5Y*: 29.06%
• 10Y*: 12.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FSEAX vs. XOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSEAX

FSEAX Risk / Return Rank: 83
FSEAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FSEAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FSEAX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FSEAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FSEAX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

XOM

XOM Risk / Return Rank: 87
XOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
XOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
XOM Omega Ratio Rank: 85
XOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
XOM Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSEAX vs. XOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund (FSEAX) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSEAX	XOM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.62	1.92	-0.31
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.15	2.44	-0.29
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.33	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.23	3.06	-0.83
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.05	7.95	+0.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSEAX vs. XOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSEAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the XOM Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSEAX and XOM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSEAX	XOM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.62	1.92	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10	1.10	-1.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60	0.44	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.49	-0.10

Correlation

The correlation between FSEAX and XOM is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FSEAX vs. XOM - Dividend Comparison

FSEAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than XOM's 2.38% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSEAX Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund	0.21%	0.22%	0.00%	0.08%	0.00%	14.14%	14.10%	6.15%	3.44%	0.05%	1.26%	0.44%
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation	2.38%	3.32%	3.57%	3.68%	3.22%	5.70%	8.44%	4.92%	4.74%	3.66%	3.30%	3.69%

Drawdowns

FSEAX vs. XOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSEAX drawdown since its inception was -65.59%, which is greater than XOM's maximum drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSEAX and XOM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSEAX	XOM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.59%	-62.40%	-3.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.42%	-16.05%	+2.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.64%	-20.51%	-33.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.07%	-61.34%	+3.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.42%	-1.06%	-12.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.80%	-10.20%	-14.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.71%	6.17%	-2.46%

Volatility

FSEAX vs. XOM - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund (FSEAX) has a higher volatility of 9.42% compared to Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) at 6.40%. This indicates that FSEAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSEAX	XOM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.42%	6.40%	+3.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.42%	16.13%	-1.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.22%	24.86%	-4.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.52%	26.49%	-3.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.75%	27.88%	-7.13%