FSEAX vs. XOM

In the year-to-date period, FSEAX achieves a 1.93% return, which is significantly higher than XOM's 1.83% return. Over the past 10 years, FSEAX has underperformed XOM with an annualized return of 3.29%, while XOM has yielded a comparatively higher 6.72% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund (FSEAX) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FSEAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is higher than the XOM Sharpe Ratio of -0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSEAX and XOM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FSEAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%.

The maximum FSEAX drawdown since its inception was -65.12%, roughly equal to the maximum XOM drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSEAX and XOM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund (FSEAX) is 11.52%, while Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) has a volatility of 13.56%. This indicates that FSEAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.