PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSCOX vs. HSCZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSCOX vs. HSCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Small Cap Opportunities Fund (FSCOX) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSCOX achieves a 7.70% return, which is significantly lower than HSCZ's 10.57% return. Over the past 10 years, FSCOX has underperformed HSCZ with an annualized return of 9.05%, while HSCZ has yielded a comparatively higher 11.62% annualized return.


FSCOX

1D
0.56%
1M
2.80%
YTD
7.70%
6M
10.24%
1Y
17.41%
3Y*
14.54%
5Y*
4.97%
10Y*
9.05%

HSCZ

1D
-0.17%
1M
4.13%
YTD
10.57%
6M
13.25%
1Y
28.62%
3Y*
18.68%
5Y*
10.97%
10Y*
11.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSCOX vs. HSCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSCOX
Fidelity International Small Cap Opportunities Fund
7.70%25.05%4.08%16.99%-28.93%17.66%19.61%29.07%-14.13%34.70%
HSCZ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF
10.57%25.74%12.89%17.03%-11.46%17.75%6.40%27.89%-13.99%24.52%

Correlation

The correlation between FSCOX and HSCZ is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2015

0.73

The correlation between FSCOX and HSCZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSCOX vs. HSCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSCOX
FSCOX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FSCOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSCOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSCOX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FSCOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSCOX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

HSCZ
HSCZ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
HSCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
HSCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSCOX vs. HSCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Small Cap Opportunities Fund (FSCOX) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSCOXHSCZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.23

2.57

-1.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.82

3.63

-1.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.48

-0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

2.99

-1.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.11

12.84

-7.73

FSCOX vs. HSCZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSCOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the HSCZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSCOX and HSCZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSCOXHSCZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

2.57

-1.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.82

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.74

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.67

-0.29

Drawdowns

FSCOX vs. HSCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSCOX drawdown since its inception was -72.65%, which is greater than HSCZ's maximum drawdown of -34.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCOX and HSCZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSCOXHSCZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.65%

-34.89%

-37.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.02%

-9.61%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.69%

-12.81%

-1.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.75%

-20.11%

-20.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.75%

-34.89%

-5.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

-0.98%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.51%

-4.65%

-13.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.29%

2.23%

+1.06%

Volatility

FSCOX vs. HSCZ - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity International Small Cap Opportunities Fund (FSCOX) has a higher volatility of 4.34% compared to iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ) at 3.44%. This indicates that FSCOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSCOXHSCZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

3.44%

+0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.88%

9.20%

+1.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.73%

11.21%

+2.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.74%

13.46%

+3.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.10%

15.66%

+0.44%

FSCOX vs. HSCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSCOX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than HSCZ's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSCOX vs. HSCZ - Dividend Comparison

FSCOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.19%, more than HSCZ's 2.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSCOX
Fidelity International Small Cap Opportunities Fund
11.19%12.05%6.41%3.73%6.40%8.83%0.00%1.09%2.99%1.31%1.43%0.47%
HSCZ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF
2.94%3.25%3.26%2.98%26.91%2.90%1.46%4.66%6.15%2.52%2.57%1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSCOX and HSCZ have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSCOX has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to HSCZ (3.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSCOX dropped -72.65% vs HSCZ's -34.89%.

HSCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSCOX and HSCZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer