FSBDX vs. FATEX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund (FSBDX) and Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class M (FATEX).

FSBDX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 7, 2013. FATEX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 3, 1996.

Performance

FSBDX vs. FATEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund (FSBDX) and Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class M (FATEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FSBDX vs. FATEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSBDX Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund	-6.92%	20.31%	39.76%	57.42%	-37.20%	22.53%	62.77%	33.24%	4.53%	35.27%
FATEX Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class M	0.00%	24.05%	34.69%	58.93%	-36.34%	26.95%	63.52%	50.18%	-8.78%	49.01%

Returns By Period

FSBDX

• 1D: 4.49%
• 1M: -4.93%
• YTD: -6.92%
• 6M: -3.87%
• 1Y: 27.69%
• 3Y*: 27.12%
• 5Y*: 12.43%
• 10Y*: 19.89%

FATEX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSBDX vs. FATEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSBDX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FATEX's 1.21% expense ratio.

FATEX

Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class M

FSBDX

Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund

Return for Risk

FSBDX vs. FATEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSBDX

FSBDX Risk / Return Rank: 73
FSBDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
FSBDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
FSBDX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
FSBDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
FSBDX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSBDX vs. FATEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund (FSBDX) and Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class M (FATEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSBDX	FATEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.78	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.10	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.31	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSBDX	FATEX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.17	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.81	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between FSBDX and FATEX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FSBDX vs. FATEX - Dividend Comparison

FSBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, less than FATEX's 12.39% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSBDX Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund	4.01%	3.73%	8.92%	0.54%	3.93%	24.67%	40.16%	11.36%	15.87%	10.80%	1.41%	13.10%
FATEX Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class M	12.39%	12.39%	8.86%	4.29%	4.07%	13.60%	8.26%	2.48%	25.20%	8.44%	1.60%	4.60%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FSBDX	FATEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.47%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.33%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.46%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FSBDX	FATEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.75%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.03%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.87%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.82%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.45%	—	—