FSBDX vs. FATEX

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FSBDX having a -10.13% return and FATEX slightly lower at -10.19%. Over the past 10 years, FSBDX has underperformed FATEX with an annualized return of 5.16%, while FATEX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.12% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FSBDX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FATEX's 1.21% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund (FSBDX) and Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class M (FATEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FSBDX Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the FATEX Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSBDX and FATEX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FSBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, while FATEX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum FSBDX drawdown since its inception was -55.57%, smaller than the maximum FATEX drawdown of -82.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSBDX and FATEX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund (FSBDX) is 8.92%, while Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class M (FATEX) has a volatility of 10.16%. This indicates that FSBDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FATEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.