FSANX vs. AOR

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FSANX (Fidelity Asset Manager 60% Fund) and AOR (iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, FSANX returned 8.79%/yr vs 8.46%/yr for AOR. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FSANX charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AOR.

Performance

FSANX vs. AOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Asset Manager 60% Fund (FSANX) and iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSANX achieves a 9.84% return, which is significantly higher than AOR's 7.96% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSANX having a 8.79% annualized return and AOR not far behind at 8.46%.

FSANX

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 3.14%
• YTD: 9.84%
• 6M: 10.97%
• 1Y: 23.08%
• 3Y*: 14.50%
• 5Y*: 7.13%
• 10Y*: 8.79%

AOR

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 3.07%
• YTD: 7.96%
• 6M: 8.80%
• 1Y: 20.12%
• 3Y*: 14.41%
• 5Y*: 7.20%
• 10Y*: 8.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSANX vs. AOR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSANX Fidelity Asset Manager 60% Fund	9.84%	16.61%	9.48%	14.81%	-16.25%	11.85%	16.15%	20.64%	-6.60%	15.04%
AOR iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF	7.96%	16.44%	10.68%	15.75%	-15.64%	11.19%	11.42%	18.91%	-5.82%	15.80%

Correlation

The correlation between FSANX and AOR is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2008	0.94

The correlation between FSANX and AOR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FSANX vs. AOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSANX

FSANX Risk / Return Rank: 76
FSANX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
FSANX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
FSANX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
FSANX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
FSANX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

AOR

AOR Risk / Return Rank: 71
AOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
AOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
AOR Omega Ratio Rank: 75
AOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
AOR Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSANX vs. AOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Asset Manager 60% Fund (FSANX) and iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSANX	AOR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.58	2.41	+0.18
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.63	3.43	+0.20
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.45	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.30	3.08	+0.22
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.52	13.48	+1.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSANX vs. AOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSANX Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the AOR Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSANX and AOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSANX	AOR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.58	2.41	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	0.69	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80	0.80	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.69	-0.14

Drawdowns

FSANX vs. AOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSANX drawdown since its inception was -41.49%, which is greater than AOR's maximum drawdown of -24.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSANX and AOR.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSANX	AOR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.49%	-24.44%	-17.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.09%	-6.64%	-0.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.99%	-9.77%	-1.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.39%	-21.72%	-0.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.42%	-22.95%	-1.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.44%	-3.48%	-1.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.61%	1.52%	+0.09%

Volatility

FSANX vs. AOR - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Asset Manager 60% Fund (FSANX) has a higher volatility of 2.99% compared to iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) at 2.70%. This indicates that FSANX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSANX	AOR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.99%	2.70%	+0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.47%	6.81%	+0.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.15%	8.40%	+0.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.80%	10.55%	+0.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.97%	10.67%	+0.30%

FSANX vs. AOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSANX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than AOR's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSANX vs. AOR - Dividend Comparison

FSANX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.32%, more than AOR's 2.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AOR iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF	2.46%	2.55%	2.66%	2.50%	2.12%	1.64%	1.89%	2.56%	2.49%	4.51%	2.16%	2.12%
FSANX Fidelity Asset Manager 60% Fund	5.32%	5.84%	3.28%	1.93%	4.44%	2.52%	1.89%	4.14%	4.43%	1.78%	0.20%	4.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSANX and AOR in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, FSANX and AOR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FSANX or AOR?

FSANX has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to AOR (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSANX dropped -41.49% vs AOR's -24.44%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSANX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.