PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRTY vs. MOAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FRTY vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF (FRTY) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FRTY vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FRTY
Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF
-7.33%12.82%38.86%16.81%-42.23%2.07%
MOAT
VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
-6.87%13.20%10.73%31.89%-13.66%15.27%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRTY achieves a -7.33% return, which is significantly lower than MOAT's -6.87% return.


FRTY

1D
0.15%
1M
-6.34%
YTD
-7.33%
6M
-12.57%
1Y
21.96%
3Y*
17.11%
5Y*
0.76%
10Y*

MOAT

1D
-0.26%
1M
-9.39%
YTD
-6.87%
6M
-2.70%
1Y
11.53%
3Y*
10.62%
5Y*
7.92%
10Y*
13.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FRTY vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRTY has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MOAT's 0.48% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FRTY vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRTY
FRTY Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
FRTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRTY Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FRTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRTY Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

MOAT
MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRTY vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF (FRTY) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRTYMOATDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.79

0.59

+0.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.20

0.98

+0.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.13

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

0.83

+0.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.24

3.12

+0.12

FRTY vs. MOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is higher than the MOAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRTY and MOAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRTYMOATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

0.59

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.44

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

0.75

-0.75

Correlation

The correlation between FRTY and MOAT is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FRTY vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison

FRTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than MOAT's 1.46% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRTY
Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF
0.21%0.19%0.10%0.00%0.00%5.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MOAT
VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
1.46%1.36%1.37%0.86%1.25%1.08%1.46%1.31%1.79%1.07%1.17%2.13%

Drawdowns

FRTY vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRTY drawdown since its inception was -53.15%, which is greater than MOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRTY and MOAT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FRTYMOATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.15%

-33.31%

-19.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.75%

-13.30%

-6.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.15%

-23.96%

-29.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.10%

-10.42%

-7.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.58%

-3.80%

-24.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.02%

3.55%

+3.47%

Volatility

FRTY vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison

Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF (FRTY) has a higher volatility of 9.29% compared to VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) at 4.78%. This indicates that FRTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FRTYMOATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.29%

4.78%

+4.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.59%

10.10%

+9.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.00%

19.76%

+8.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.02%

18.09%

+8.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.11%

18.71%

+8.40%