FRT vs. VOOG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FRT (Federal Realty Investment Trust) is a stock, while VOOG (Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. Over the past 10 years, FRT returned 1.17%/yr vs 18.15%/yr for VOOG. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FRT vs. VOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRT achieves a 21.10% return, which is significantly higher than VOOG's 13.78% return. Over the past 10 years, FRT has underperformed VOOG with an annualized return of 1.17%, while VOOG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.15% annualized return.

FRT

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 4.32%
• YTD: 21.10%
• 6M: 24.72%
• 1Y: 31.28%
• 3Y*: 14.28%
• 5Y*: 4.59%
• 10Y*: 1.17%

VOOG

• 1D: -0.93%
• 1M: 7.44%
• YTD: 13.78%
• 6M: 13.58%
• 1Y: 34.04%
• 3Y*: 28.13%
• 5Y*: 16.03%
• 10Y*: 18.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRT vs. VOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FRT Federal Realty Investment Trust	21.10%	-5.91%	12.07%	6.55%	-22.66%	65.97%	-30.66%	12.51%	-8.10%	-3.59%
VOOG Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF	13.78%	22.11%	35.89%	29.96%	-29.48%	31.95%	33.35%	30.93%	-0.21%	27.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FRT and VOOG is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010	0.39

Over the past year, the correlation between FRT and VOOG has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FRT vs. VOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRT

FRT Risk / Return Rank: 86
FRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FRT Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FRT Martin Ratio Rank: 88

VOOG

VOOG Risk / Return Rank: 58
VOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
VOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
VOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 59
VOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
VOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRT vs. VOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FRT	VOOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	2.16	-0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	2.91	-0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.37	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.51	2.49	+2.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.00	10.32	+0.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FRT vs. VOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRT Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the VOOG Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRT and VOOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FRT	VOOG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.84	2.16	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20	0.76	-0.56
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.04	0.88	-0.84
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.91	-0.50

Drawdowns

FRT vs. VOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRT drawdown since its inception was -57.42%, which is greater than VOOG's maximum drawdown of -32.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRT and VOOG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FRT	VOOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.42%	-32.73%	-24.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.96%	-13.71%	+6.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.38%	-22.18%	-5.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.99%	-32.73%	-2.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.47%	-32.73%	-23.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.35%	-1.08%	-0.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.78%	-4.97%	-6.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.85%	3.31%	-0.46%

Volatility

FRT vs. VOOG - Volatility Comparison

Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) have volatilities of 4.11% and 4.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FRT	VOOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.11%	4.32%	-0.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.77%	12.41%	-0.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.10%	15.85%	+1.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.35%	21.19%	+2.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.43%	20.73%	+8.70%

Dividends

FRT vs. VOOG - Dividend Comparison

FRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, more than VOOG's 0.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FRT Federal Realty Investment Trust	3.76%	4.39%	2.93%	4.21%	4.26%	3.12%	4.96%	3.22%	3.42%	2.98%	2.70%	2.48%
VOOG Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF	0.44%	0.49%	0.49%	1.12%	0.93%	0.53%	0.88%	1.26%	1.34%	1.32%	1.47%	1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FRT and VOOG in my portfolio?

FRT and VOOG have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FRT or VOOG?

VOOG has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to FRT (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRT dropped -57.42% vs VOOG's -32.73%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.